Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Snapchat: "We also work to proactively escalate to law enforcement any content appearing to involve imminent threats to life, such as...bomb threats..."

So looks like Snapchat leaked it to the Brits who passed it to the Spanish.




So, if Snapchat is doing surveillance on private conversations, is it reasonable to assume almost all “private” conversations on all platforms are subjected to bulk surveillance?


Any data that exists on servers that are not owned directly by you are subject to warrantless surveillance by way of the Third Party Doctrine in the United States.

It's not only reasonable to assume it, but to assume otherwise would be negligent.


Of course.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: