"I teach two Master’s-level courses at Georgetown University, and as such, I’ve received guidance on how the program allows the use of tools like ChatGPT and Bard."
I think, at a M.Sc. level, we ought to perhaps move to allowing only peer reviewed material. In any case, the following surely rings some loud alarm bells about student quality and/or their motivation:
"In one example, I saw students reference descriptions of what might be AI-related libraries or software as operating systems. In a recent module on operating systems, for instance, students enthusiastically described ‘artificial intelligence operating systems (AI OS)’ and even ‘Blockchain OS’. There’s just one issue — there’s no such thing as an AI OS or Blockchain OS."
I think, at a M.Sc. level, we ought to perhaps move to allowing only peer reviewed material. In any case, the following surely rings some loud alarm bells about student quality and/or their motivation:
"In one example, I saw students reference descriptions of what might be AI-related libraries or software as operating systems. In a recent module on operating systems, for instance, students enthusiastically described ‘artificial intelligence operating systems (AI OS)’ and even ‘Blockchain OS’. There’s just one issue — there’s no such thing as an AI OS or Blockchain OS."