I'm getting into Pinterest, trying to figure out what the sharing, socializing, and marketing opportunities are over there. Some of those members have millions of followers. Amazing. It's like having your own private newspaper.
But heck if I want to spend my time creating yet more content for some other third-party to make money on. So I can kind of see what they're getting at here.
What I decided to do was create a blog just for new stuff I'd share on Pinterest. I post to my blog and then pin from my blog. ( shameless plug: http://i-heart.us/ Note this is mostly just Amazon affiliate stuff but I already have another blog dedicated to just interesting pictures http://caption-of-the-day.com)
I think if you could automate _that_ process, where instead of pinning you'd post on your own account and then pin, you'd get the best of both worlds. Having your site look and feel like Pinterest would be bonus points.
I like this idea a lot. To me having finer control over your own content is a much more important feature than nailing an exact Pinterest clone.
I consume a lot of stuff from Amazon, so I initially thought I'd just pin whatever I liked and use an affiliate link. That way if somebody else liked my image recommendation enough to chase it down over on Amazon, I'd get a small cut.
But Pinterest does not like you doing this. Somebody said they were stripping out your affiliate code and adding their own.
I thought about the 10 million ways around this, but at the end of the day I decided that if I controlled the content on my own site, I could do damn well what I wanted with it. Plus over many years it might start picking up search traffic. Who knows? And when the next whiz-bang super cool social site comes out, I still have all of my stuff in the same place.
I have no intention of spamming Pinterest, but if I'm taking time to participate and add my recommendation to some product, it kind of rubs me the wrong way that they would so directly take control like that.
They used to use Skimlinks - which convert any links (affiliate or not) to their affiliate links. It was in their TOS. I was happy with that, because they've got to make money somehow. Lots of sites do it. But the blogosphere hated it, and I think Pinterest stopped doing it. There have been threads on HN giving clear details about how to bypass it.
It works with amzn.to. Haven't really tried it with anything else; I just pinned an item that was available at Amazon, and I preferred to use my own referral on it. I don't intend to make a business out of posting on Pinterest.
I think you missed the point of Pinterest. This is to Pinterest what iPhoto is to Facebook.
But I'll be honest, I was first interested in Pinterest because I thought it would be a lovely bookmark aggregator. This does that pretty well from the look of it, but it's definitely a self-hosted image bookmarker with a Pinterest-esque interface, rather than a self-hosted curated web.
Might be splitting hairs over a title, but the difference is significant.
A search for "thinsperation" shows they're not doing a very good job of it.
I know (many) people with anorexia. They are amazing at hiding stuff. (Fishing weight shot sewed into bras; heavier weight sewed into hair scrunchies. This made the weekly weigh-in easier to pass while still starving.)
I'm glad Pinterest has made the gesture, but they'll never win.
I still use pocket because their mobile app is pretty good at extracting text and storing it locally so I don't need a network, but there are a lot of things that pocket isn't good for, like bookmarking some tutorial or library I'd like to follow/integrate later. That's where pinboard has been very excellent. I was even able to hack together a python script and migrate most of my old pocket links over, and it already has a feature to scrape my new pockets.
And the best part about it being paid only is that I get some assurance that my bookmarks there will stay available.
If you're looking to curate bookmarks for self/private use you could try Springpad. It does a lot more than just bookmarks (photos, notes, tasks, etc.) but it surely could be used to just organize that kind of data.
Phantomjs (http://phantomjs.org/) is a nice headless webkit browser that can be used to generate screenshots of entire pages (or clipped portions). It's got a nice API and a reasonably straightforward install. I've also heard good things about ghost.py (http://jeanphix.me/Ghost.py/). These might be handy if you can't find a good image.
There is none and I don't plan on creating one. I understand why you want one but I don't want to bother with hosting a dynamic website that I would have to manage. (Rather spend the time improving the app itself.) I include a screenshot and an example is wookmark or pinterest's websites. It functions like those. If you want a demo of this exact app then clone it and run it. It's free and open source!
> I don't want to bother with hosting a dynamic website that I would have to manage.
Out of curiosity, after once deploying it, what're some responsibilities that entail from hosting a dynamic website vs. a static one? Isn't it basically a matter of writing (/copying a good one and retrofitting) a fabric script, perhaps doing just a few things with some Apache/nginx config files, and just putting it up? What exactly makes it more hands-on post-launch?
I had been under the impression that this process would not take more than a few hours by itself.
I also want an example page and dont want to have to install it on my server before even knowing the quality of the product... should you ever get around to it, a demo would help a lot. otherwise, the screenshot looks cool. happy coding!
Awesome! If I get some time I might hack this up into some type of self-hosted evernote thing. I just started using evernote and it's nice but most of my notes are pictures/sites and this looks to be a great fit.
That's actually partially what I'm trying to do! I mostly just bookmark a lot of random sites and images and wanted an quick-view Pinterest like interface to put on top of that. If you create some nice features please pull-request. I'll gladly take a look.
I came here to comment just this. I downloaded it for fun and was stoked to see manage.py! Interesting indeed to explore others' conventions. I particularly like settings as a module.
One thing I tend to avoid, however (of course this is just my personal taste) is templates in each sub-app. I feel like at that point there are just too many nested directories. I'd rather have one global templates dir for the entire project.
I often-times argue with myself over this. I do agree that one global template dir is nice but it makes the apps less copy-and-paste-able and I feel like Django apps were meant to be somewhat self-contained.
However, sometimes you have so many cross-links between apps in Django projects that taking out a single app to use in another project basically breaks most of the functionality.
There are big pros and cons for doing it either way.
Very cool, I already adapted Pinry to a direct PHP/MySQL implementation, as I'm not a Django user (yet). Applying the new UI to http://www.myinfoq.com/ to make it easier to discover information about your interests and should help as a demo/reference site. Thanks overshard, hope I can contribute back to the community. @dugald3
Actually it uses the built in Django auth system, it has a registration page and everything already. You can have multiple people with accounts posting stuff on here if you wanted to expand it to multiple people in a company.
I'll create an issue to expand in this direction a bit though, great idea!
Be sure you have a version of PIL that has support for the image type you are trying to save. Also be sure that pins/pin is a directory. As the error says it does not see it as such. I've only tested this under Ubuntu 12.04 though so it may be a bug, please report an Issue on GitHub...
Clipboard also allows you to clip almost arbitrary parts of web pages (text, images, embeds) with the style and most functionality preserved. See http://www.clipboard.com/site/ycombinator.com for examples of things clipped from Hacker News.
No, I rather not deal with hosting/curating a demo site for something I advertise as being "self-hosted" and work on developing the item itself. Look to wookmark or pinterest websites, it works very similar to them.
You can also clone it and have your own demo up and running very fast.