1) Don't let your legal department harass your fans. Your lawyers decided what they can do legally. You decide what they should do in service of your business goals.
2..n) All of the other rules are just rule 1 again, but with recursive and geometrically increasing internet mocking added on each time you break it again.
It wasn't Hasbro's legal but an outside firm. Legal firms make money by taking actions (eg writing letters) and billing hours of "work" they have done. It is in their interest to do as much of these as possible.
I have also been threatened in the same way by lawyers working for LG. Instead of just asking me where I got the "confidential" information I posted (it was posted to usenet and some websites) they came down on me and delivered stuff to my employer claiming that me and "my accomplices at a carrier" had stolen it.
I pointed out to the lawyer that he was an unpleasant person, I would have told him or anyone else who asked where the information come from (but not provide training on how to use google) and that shooting first and then asking questions was a stupid way of operating. I was threatened with lawsuits etc, so I told him to go ahead and also to make sure that LG knew he was being an idiot on their behalf. More blustering and threats.
Then I get a call from LG with the lawyer on the line where the LG person was actually pretty decent and it was obvious they had no idea what the lawyer was doing. I told them that if they apologised then I'd happily tell them exactly what I would have told them if they had just asked nicely in the first place and delete the information (which of course could still be readily found all over using Google).
So they said they would and I kept up my end of the deal. They then proceeded to not actually apologise.
(I ran an extremely popular site for a particular LG cell phone helping many fans. The "confidential" information was what the changes were in each firmware update. It was rather boring stuff but there were fairly frequent updates so naturally people wanted to know what the changes were each time.)
TLDR: So I have learned my lesson. Lawyers are worthless scum and you should never believe a word they say. You cannot expect them to behave within the bounds of human decency. And they get to bill someone for every hour they act like pricks.
The law firm filed with ICANN and took a domain name that we had that I had freely offered to our partners whenever they were ready to use it. I tried to transfer the domain to the partner but the lawyer had already taken it, and held it hostage for the payment of the legal bill! They still have it.
You have to be very clear with lawyers where their work ends or they'll make-work you to get a few more hours and make you look like an ass in the process.
Someone, somewhere in the company has got to have the ability to say, "wait, no, that would make us look like giant asses."
Also any employee who began to feel that what he/she was doing was becoming slightly more posterior than anterior could defer to the Dept of NMULLA.
They are not in the critical path when asshattery flows out of legal, through management, and spills into the public space.
I wonder how Aaron Barr is doing these days?
Or worse: They could be used to prove he is guilty of something, whether perjury, or in threatening the eventual demise of Hasbro. Good intentions tend to come back to bite you when large corporations and their legal teams are involved.
Wiggum: I mailed these bogus prize certificates to every scofflaw in
Springfield. When they show up for their free motor boats we arrest
them and beat them to the full extent of the law.
Eddie: So the hook is baited.
Lou: Nice metaphore Eddie!
Wiggum: Yeah, good work, Eddie!
(Apologies for awful daily mail source.)
This comment doesn't expand the conversation, it just expresses an opinion and doesn't attempt to engage the original poster. In scolding delsarto for creating a post with (I assume) limited on-topic discussion & engagement potential, you've created another post with limited on-topic discussion & engagement potential.
We already have some language in the guidelines on how to engage in discussion, but maybe something specific to "what about posts you don't think add to the discussion"? OTOH, Communities that try to enforce rules too stringently end up being communities about those rules.
I can't understand how Hasbro or their legal firm could get it so wrong. If their legal firm is to blame for this, they should be fired on the spot.
I take it you haven't experienced the innards of a huge company before.
This is the classic stink of a broken management onion. Maybe I'm jaded but I don't find this kind of corporate bullshit surprising anymore.
Basically, Gembe hacked in to Valve's servers and obtained Half Life 2's source code. Roughly half a year later, after Valve had given up on the case, Gembe admitted to it later in an e-mail to Valve. After quizzing him on the attack vectors used, Valve conducted a phone interview, then wanted an in-person interview, stating they wanted to offer him a job. The latter would be in Seattle, where they actually planned to arrest him.
I don't know who they're targeting with those things though. Do they really think that a lot of people will come to a site for the first time, then decide to hand over their email/sign up/whatever after a grand total of five seconds on the page?
Have there been any studies done on this?
You're lucky that even works - you have to specially program that functionality, and I see too many websites that don't, forcing me to find the close button.
And for extra irritation have the close button only fade in after a few seconds....
Is this a reference that we're supposed to be familiar with, or is it for an Australian audience, or for Nerf fans?
But yeah, that's where my mind went first, too.