Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's a brutal critique which comes close to a charge of scientific fraud. I'd be curious to see a response. If there isn't one, I know what to think.



Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-back) links to a semi-rebuttal:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289610...

Naturally, the full article is behind a paywall.


Jaeggi 2010 http://www.gwern.net/DNB%20FAQ#jaeggi-2010 did not address the main criticism of Moody, and administered the tests speeded as in Jaeggi 2008.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: