Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

If only because every person who owns NYT stock at a $950 million market cap expects it to go up - otherwise why hold the stock?

Asset allocation is about relative performance and capital preservation in real terms.

You're right about that. I didn't consider people buying and holding expecting zero real returns, vs eg T-Bills which might offer negative.

But my point was that you'd be merely matching an offer that they'd already implicitly turned down because they expect a better offer later - sell their share of the company at the current market cap.

That can include capital preservation, e.g. maybe you'd rather have exactly 100% of your portfolio value in real terms in 20 years than 100% now, since you believe the market will go down.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact