Note that many of the artifacts are interactive: buttons and links are clickable (effectful within the museum, does not leave page), text is scrollable, videos play, etc
I'm virtually certain the audio clip that plays when you connect to AOL Dial-Up is not a modem from 1991. To my ear it sounds like a 28.8 or 33.6 modem
Well, it says connected at 52kbps... and the handshake was pretty short, I think it may be a 56k accelerated handshake that could happen if the line characteristics were similar to a previous call. Not sure if that's in all of x2/kflex/v.90/v.92, but it's in some of them.
They should add to the emoji page a blurb about them also being called "emoticons." I remember a big debate about this, and we collectively decided to call them emojis.
Also, the helicopter game was going around on DOS well before 2002. I was playing that around 1993 on a Gateway 386.
They were the same thing at one time. "Emoticons" came first.[1] When someone replaced :-) with a smiley picture, there was a debate about whether they should be called emoticons or emojis. Emoji won out.
> When someone replaced :-) with a smiley picture, there was a debate about whether they should be called emoticons or emojis
[citation needed].
The history of the word emoji isn't some mysterious thing - the wikipedia article linked in your parent post has it all laid out.
Emoji is a Japanese word meaning pictograph, it isn't derived from the word 'emoticon'. They were developed by Japanese phone companies as an idiomatic expressive addition to Japanese writing, not because 'someone replaced :-) with a smiley picture'. There was no time when they might have ended up being called emoticons.
Yeah, I'm not saying emoji came from emoticon. I'm saying some people called them emoticons, and others called them emojis. At some point, we there was a debate about it on the internet (when the internet was much smaller), and the collective decision was to call them emojis.
I'm citing myself as a primary source because I was there when it happened.
Right - the fact that Emoji and Emoticons share the first 3 letters is a complete coincidence; The word Emoji is a portmanteau of the Japanese words É (絵; picture) and Moji (文字; letters).
"Emoticon" used to be the general term and was also often applied to smileys in forums (which are more closely related to the kind of custom "emojis" you still find in places like Slack or Twitch). In those cases the term has definitely been superceded by "emoji" but this is due to them being hard to distinguish from real Unicode emojis.
"Emoticon" refered to symbol combinations. "Emoji" only arrived on the scene in the English-speaking world via Unicode. I think I've heard both terms being used to refer to kaomojis (CJK symbol combinations) before that but I'm not sure. The only change I'm aware of is that smileys already present in Unicode via extended ASCII are now sometimes also referred to as "emojis" although they technically aren't. They were never called emoticons though and emoticons are generally not called "emojis".
After learning that his experiment had gone awry, Morris asked a friend to anonymously relay an apology and instructions for removing the worm to internet users
CMU's Internet Confessional Booth was great reading, too.
I recall there was a dropdown for confessing "fish in microwave", which was the original sin that inspired the CMU grad students who created it.
Here's Bennet Yee's old page at CMU (last update 4 April 1996) with a link to it and other classic stuff, but it's long gone and not in the internet archive:
I had that thought too! I double checked the URL. I remember my friends trying desperately to convince me to go to the .com and I refused because they were so obviously suspicious.
In that vein, I would have expected 2ch[1] to be included in the list of artifacts. 2ch inspired 2chan[2], which inspired 4chan later. 2ch is an enormous anonymous bulletin board system that was home to many communities.
definitely seems very like in the post-2000s section, especially considering the exponential growth of the internet (that it itself alludes to), it seems to focus a lot more on the pre-2000 content, with a small handful of misc stuff from after.
> The reaction to the [first spam] email was overwhelmingly negative: one user claimed it broke his computer system, and the US Defense Communications Agency called his company to complain. >>Thuerk claims he sold $13 to $14 million worth of mainframe computers through the campaign<<.
(>>emphasis mine<<)
It was truly a sign of things to come, and an answer to why we can't have nice things.
This is probably going to spark a dumb argument that's been done to death, but aren't emoticons typographical based? Those look like pictograms or arguably early emoji.
They're actually overstrikes of existing characters! The PLATO terminal had some wack stuff built into it, courtesy, I suspect, of the vector buffers it was initially designed with. That kind of computational overhead limited the expansion of the system into commodity equipment, a definite cloud of doom.
We can really, really go down the rabbit hole with encoding. Wireless morse had several equivalents to "emoticons" in its text encoding, and typesetters had zillions of different emoticons they could and did fabricate. Indeed, these are the first documented examples.
PLATO is an oddball system, pre-ASCII, pre-everything. That overstrike trick kind of hints at that. So if we mean ASCII-encoded emotions, yeah, PLATO loses to CM's BBS circa 1982.
Link broken. But I read about Plato in that book the Happy Orange Glow or something like it. Didn't make it all the way through but it sounded groundbreaking
It's incredible what they got out of those CDC machines. I wish I had the EE skills to figure out how they did it. I suspect that the vacuum tubes might have yielded some compute capabilities far beyond transistors of the era, given the very high power levels you can get in tubes. But I don't know. It might just be very open-ended approaches to memory registers, or simply letting the plasma display do its own thing rather than wipe it back to its initial state.
In the middle of the ARPANET map at the beginning, there's a node right in the middle called "SCOTT". I tried Googling for what this node was and didn't come up with much. Why was the node called Scott? Was it run by a guy named Scott? Or is that an acronym for some institution?
If it's a person, how and why did Scott have a PDP-11?
Club Penguin. I was so very very happy when that shut down. I - and others - were doing Support at wordpress.com. Kids (I assume) constantly exploiting other kids to get into their accounts. Kids doing anything to get traffic, using popunder scripts and more.
Helicopter game gave me flashbacks. IIRC my high score was around 44,000.
ALong side that I'd hall of fame a "3d pong" game which was available only in "Macromedia shockwave". Impossible to even find a screenshot of it now, it was beautiful 3d for its time.
No not really irc, more of a spiritual descendent of Habitat, and a direct descendent of two other online massively multiplayer games and also Flickr, developed by Stewart Butterfield:
The Lessons of Lucasfilm's Habitat (1990) (stanford.edu):
It let users create and upload content like text and pictures, so it had a nice image uploader component and content management system.
That didn't work out, so they took the image uploader and cms and pivoted to making an app called "Flickr", which Yahoo bought.
Later on he redeveloped a new version of GNE in Flash called "Glitch", that was a whole lot like Habitat, in that it had these long horizontal areas you could walk left and right around, and chat with other people with avatars, and do fun stuff.
"In March 1989, Tim Berners-Lee wrote the initial proposal for the World Wide Web, envisioning it as a "universal linked information system" to help researchers share information."
Statement of Facts
Idea: Let's use this system to disseminate advertising.
Idea: Let's use this system to run code automatically on peoples' computers.
Idea: Let's use this system as a means for people to communicate with their family and friends over the internet by uploading their "private" messages to a third party's website.
Idea: ???
Universal linked information system --> universal internet surveillance system
Question
Is the web still suitable to help researchers share information if so-called "tech" companies intermediate access to all information and seek to commercialise all web use.
> Is the web still suitable to help researchers share information if so-called "tech" companies intermediate access to all information and seek to commercialise all web use.
Yes, plenty of researchers share information via the web.
There was some original vision for the web, and of course that vision has changed in the past 30 years.
Fantastic work.