Agreed but then who would manage the state clerks IT department? Deloitte? It’s a case of “You’re in the wrong but we secretly need you because we are even more incompetent”
I mean BAH or whoever can continue doing that after they pay back the stolen funds if the state clerk will allow it.
I'm just griping with, time after time, a company stealing 100m dollars or whatever and then reaching a settlement that lets them get off scott free after paying back 50m.
