> have you considered a varargs call for setting parameters with type codes?
Varargs are supported when building a prepared statement, but not for setting wildcards values. I see what you mean and how the client code can be made more compact. Still, I believe setting one by one value by explicit type may be better for readability, is less error prone and as you say, is more OO and orthogonal.
one more thing that i assume must work this way, but you don't seem to have documented, is how to test for exceptions. i guess SQL_Exception (a return value, right?) is false when there's no error?
related: do you have any examples that include all the error handling that would be necessary in a real app? how do you display the exception details (it seems to be an opaque type) to the user? perhaps i am missing something here (can't even find exception in the clickable API image)?
(wish i had known about this a few months ago as it would have saved me some work - thanks).
Thanks. The documentation for exceptions may be some clicks away, but it's there. Here's a direct link. http://www.tildeslash.com/libzdb/api-docs/Exception_8h.html Exceptions are a "true" exception implementation based on the Except code from David Hanson's excellent CII book. This makes it possible to write more compact code without peppering your C code with return code tests.