> posts a completely mischaracterized version of said meeting already
Do you have a link to that? Ive been looking. I can only find Christian's account of the events [1]
> one-party consent state, so he was fully in his right to do everything he did
And I fully support his decision to do so. Ive even done the same in Japan when I was against a very hostile CEO. But posting publicly moves into very different realms (also not illegal) outside of just recording discussions.
> as you keep implying
In fact, I dont. I keep acknowledging blame on both sides of the equation. Go back and objectively read the discussion. Ive been much more critical of reddit. Emotions are pretty high. And those are much easier to use in discussions than deferring to unknown facts. So, I understand the weird flip-flopping of down and up votes.
> But posting publicly moves into very different realms (also not illegal) outside of just recording discussions.
It really does not, even if it hurts spez's (and your) feelings.
> Ive been much more critical of reddit.
You literally pretend things they did didn't happen. You can say you've been critical, but you have pretty much shifted the blame entirely on Christian the whole time.
Do you have a link to that? Ive been looking. I can only find Christian's account of the events [1]
> one-party consent state, so he was fully in his right to do everything he did
And I fully support his decision to do so. Ive even done the same in Japan when I was against a very hostile CEO. But posting publicly moves into very different realms (also not illegal) outside of just recording discussions.
> as you keep implying
In fact, I dont. I keep acknowledging blame on both sides of the equation. Go back and objectively read the discussion. Ive been much more critical of reddit. Emotions are pretty high. And those are much easier to use in discussions than deferring to unknown facts. So, I understand the weird flip-flopping of down and up votes.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/apolloapp/comments/144f6xm/apollo_w...