I am currently working on setting up a non-profit and plan to operate the platform just like Wikimedia runs Wikipedia. I see non-profit as the only viable, sustainable alternative in the long run. I am planting a seed, hoping others will join and help me build it, and soon enough enable me to step down. I have a full time job on the side and a family to take care of, and running this as a one-man-show is not an option.
As a long-time reddit user I applaud the idea. It looks cool and I personally think that you are correct that any kind of social media (for the future) that would not feed on its user base (ads and selling user data) should be offered by a non-profit. Personally I would not have issues if a non-profit would still offer ads it's social media site; they needs income as well, right? Just hope they would not offer the ad companies the data of it's user base.
Hey, are you aware of WT.Social? It’s run by Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia Guy) and he just released its second version. The philosophy of your product seems aligned with his. See if you wanna contribute or partner: https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/1668266400723488769
Thanks, I wasn’t aware of this project. I doubt he’d be interested, but I’d love to shake his hand and ask him for an autograph. That man is a legend! I’ll check it out!
I have a fairly negative/pessimistic take on this model, but it’s my truth: Wikipedia, in my experience, is littered with some of the most aggressive, psychologically manipulative, and persistent ads of any major site. They just happen to be ads imploring me to donate to Wikipedia.
Now, imagine a wikipedia trying to juice it's numbers before it hits IPO in order to pay out it's VC overlords so they decide to have a 'premium truth' section above the regular article where facts are open to the highest bidder, the bidder with the most Free $peech.
Wikipedia is a easy target but it's definitely a mile better than a lot of the trash out there.
There isn't one topic or person that doesn't
have a share of dirty laundry and with the media going full clickbait nowadays one can source it well by wp standards.
A serious discussion should judge if the laundry is worthy of inclusion but what you get is power users flexing their muscles. They are judge jury and executioner. Non of the edit guidelines apply but if they did get the slightest consideration, the same faceless usernames have authority over those too!
That you have a nobel prize for the subject doesn't mean you get to make perfectly valid citations without permission.
The really stupid part is that people love to pretend it isn't so in stead of seeing and indeed enjoying the facinating dynamics of human interaction with such huge transparency.
It has all agendas represented for everyone to see!
you're either being disingenuous or maybe you're legitimately ignorant, I can't tell. It's clearly not 'precisely how it works today'. Sometimes words mean things. This is one of those cases.
Are you asserting that some shadowy cabal paid wikipedia to keep 9/11 conspiracy theories off the main article? If not, how is that related to our discussion?
FWIW, I also don't see any section about whether or not bigfoot karate kicked the towers down either.
I think scaling donations is difficult. Wikipedia makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year, but its closest competitor, Google, makes hundreds of billions of dollars. But to the average person, a hundred million dollars is a hell lot of money. So people get cynical.
Also it's possible that donation models just don't work well. Dwarf Fortress is one data point. It was decent money at $15k per month, then people dropped 7 million dollars on the Steam release on the first month.
An idea I would be interested in is some kind of public-private partnership for operating internet services like social media, search, and wikis, which are necessary for the public good but have no viable economic model. The government provides the public funding and private entities build and operate the services, because no one wants to log into a government-operated reddit clone to look for onlyfans leaks. Maybe this could be accomplished with grants instead of donations?
I think a reddit-like community could easily operate on a donation-based basis. Every development is open-source, and the operation costs are displayed on the site with a progress bar for the month until filled. It would be trivial amounts so it may not even need to be displayed, will be paid so fast.
When I commented previously I've got that stupid loading animation, site header, site footer and nothing more.
Which means the front page is served dynamically instead of from the cache and what there is no indication what there would be anything to be loaded (blank space instead).
Considering I received some updoots for the previous comment I presume I wasn't alone with a blank page.
I agree that a non-profit whose incentives are aligned to support the communities and users that are on the platform is the right way to go.
Unfortunately also predicting a number of sites get stood up as competitors and then eventually pendulum back and forth until some sort of network-effect equilibrium emerges but this looks promising.
Not as familiar with dot net core and how it handles traffic scale up / DB reads. I'd gather it works OK for that sort of use?
Lots of high-scale software runs on. NET like Stackoverflow or many Azure services.
From programming paradigms it's essentially a Java clone so you scale vertically across OS threads (using abstractions like Tasks) and increase efficiency using async IO.
Doesn't sound promising to me. Pretty sure that the "real" path to success involves putting 100% in, to the point of artificially seeding the posts and comments for weeks/months. "Social" means already having an enticing place for people, whether you make it or fake it. You sound like you've already given up and are done with the project. Referencing wikimedia is putting the cart before the horse, that's fine when you already have millions of views and sweet sweet non-profit cash, but getting there is the hard part.
If I write a technical, non-commercial blog I'm not allowed to promote it, and I won't.
But crappy commercial spammers won't follow the rules and will use sock puppets to promote content anyway. Which means seo spam becomes the most common post.
Maybe a solution: donate small $ to post your own content. But it’s not for any special treatment like ads. You’re just get to share it and normal posting rules apply.
Ditto on this... I also wonder how this meshes with "You can share just about any kind of link in FlingUp." and "Anything goes on FlingUp." (from the tour)
It seems as though users may share links to whatever, but only content which they own. A difficult line to tread.
For the op, I would ask for a little more clarity on the intent.
(N.b. this might cause some issues posting AI-gen content, which is sans copyright by law, at least in the US. Maybe that's the intent?)
A rewrite is in order with clarifications. The intent is to minimize risk coming from users submitting copyrighted content (entire news articles which are behind a paywall, for example, pages or entire books etc) which could backfire if the organization/site grows. IANAL but this would have to be looked over by a proffessional.
That makes sense, but why don't you let people submit their own content? For example, if someone has a webcomic or a blog, or a photography site, or writes tutorials, or is making an amazing new app... Surely that's exactly the kind of thing that you want. Or at least an important part of it. As it stands it looks like you're saying only other people who find the webcomic (for example) can submit it.
And, if you do, that means they can't be self hosted? For example, if you write a comic, do you have to use some anonymous third party image service? Would a deviantart link be ok, even though you're associated with the page? Can I share a funny YouTube video? Does this make meme subs impossible?
I imagine this will be tough to create a community around, without some clarification.
I will support any platform to replace reddit that is 1) completely open source, 2) community driven, 3) moderators are held accountable by the communities they govern, and 4) not ad supported.
Social bookmarking is something the internet should have as part of it's infrastructure.
Unfortunately the fediverse face-planted in it's time to shine. The infra is the hard part and that all has to be controlled by the same org.
Not only you have conflicting requirements (something to be part of the internet infrastructure while controlled by a single org) your comment gives absolutely zero constructive criticism. What about the fediverse was so bad that warrants anything like "face-planted in it's (sic) time to shine?" How/who/what are you supporting that is trying to get to the goals you listed?
I'd support the same, but I'd allow ads, as long as they don't sell user data, and add long as the company is structured as a co-op or non profit org, and have full transparency on what they're spending money on, and if there's enough kitty, give back to users who are the best at moderation, quality content etc...I think fediverse is too decentralized the best you can hope for is a DAO, built as a social enterprise, maybe every user gets to vote on major things with the company. the know karma, the more your vote counts, as long as there's a way to make sure there's no karma farms...
I love the idea. But, leaving aside the idea of federation (not against it, just aware that current implementations can't handle enough users to be useful) - how do you propose that infrastructure and developers should be paid in this model?
Look how hard Wikipedia has to fight for donations and how much pushback they get over it. Wikipedia is comparatively simple, infrastructure-wise. A nonprofit reddit would need a lot more money I think.
> A nonprofit reddit would need a lot more money I think.
I don’t think so. The whole of stackoverflow is run from a single (though quite powerful) machine. Server/operation costs are cheap, employees are the big cost.
I think a donation-based model could trivially finance the service costs.
Looks pretty good and a non-profit seems perfect for something like this.
I do have to say, I really dislike the card design that seems pretty much ubiquitous at this point. By introducing a border, you need to add a bunch of padding and then margins. Between two titles, you have padding (from the upper card), border, margin, border(lower card), padding. It's so much whitespace!
How do comments work? Can you have infinitely nested comment threads? If so, I'm not sure your API will scale? Do you need to fetch replies for each comment recursively? That'll be a pretty bad experience, since you need to wait for one comment level to load before you can fetch the next one. But maybe I'm misunderstanding the API docs.
> I do have to say, I really dislike the card design that seems pretty much ubiquitous at this point
Maybe I'm showing my age, but honestly I think UI design for this type of site peaked at a list of blue links 20 years ago. It's actually one of the reasons I liked Reddit (and still love old reddit).
Yeah I did look at the docs, hence my question. If you have a deeply nested comment tree, wouldn't you have to load each level sequentially?
So let's say you have
A (root) -> B -> C -> D
Wouldn't you make one request to fetch A (root comments). Then a second request to fetch B (replies of A), another request to fetch C (replies of B) and then finally another request to fetch D (replies of C)?
And you can't fetch B,C,D in parallel, because you don't know the id's ahead of time to request the child comments.
Just something to think about, obviously doesn't matter until you have deeply nested discussions. But if you look at Reddit (or even HN) that is probably the most common case.
You’re right, and this was a tough design choice I made when I built the first prototype. Loading only first level of child comments should (correct me if I miscalculated this) be the most cost-efficient way as not every user is (hopefully) ever going to read all child comments in all levels in the hierarchy.
I wanted to make sure I understood the design decisions.
I actually have no idea what the right choice is. I only know how I use these types of sites and I usually go depth first. So I'd start with one thread, read it until I get bored, then continue. Not great for your current architecture, but I could be a weird user.
I had to design comment systems quite a few times, so I'm always curious how other people do it. I don't think there's a perfect solution, always trade offs to be made.
A comment could store a “head”/grandparent comment and a direct parent as well. For a top comment, every other comment could be fetched that has it as head, and the actual relationships can be reconstructed on server/client side as needed.
Though most dbs can do efficient recursive queries like this nowadays.
Yeah, I was thinking about the HTTP level. At the database level you can do recursive queries like you say. But on the client, with the current API, you're stuck fetching each level of comments sequentially. If you have 100-200ms per request (which is a pretty realistic scenario), loading discussions isn't going to be great.
That's very kind, thank you. The following/subscription is not implemented yet, I've been building this on the side, so quite a few features are missing but in the pipeline.
Tried to open it, it kept undefinitely in a loading animation, opened the web inspector, reloaded it and there only shows a Cloudflare message error saying that they blocked me from visiting it.
specifically it seems to be the only one trying to replicate the concept of communities.
reddit is, at it's core, a place where people can host a community discussion board. the front page is just a very shallow window into that. all the reddit-alikes seem focused on reproducing the front page. something like tildes (or non.io at the top of HN right now) looks really cool, but it's just one community. you can filter and categorize all you want, but for any post there's just one discussion for the whole site to share. that's not a reddit replacement, it's a replacement for one subreddit, with some extra filtering tools bolted on.
Why has everyone around here been writing a reddit-like platform for years? And aren't there a ton of those already? I used ieddit for a while (wow, correction) it still seems to be alive, www.ieddit.com.
I did this in order to get hands-on experience in building a platform like this. A lot goes into it, even though it doesn’t seem so by looking at what is rendered. Full stack, from data model to frontend client. I was new to Keycloak, TypeScript and React, and this was challenging enough to learn how to use the technology behind. I learn best by doing.
Nice, that's always a good reason to do something. It just seems odd that at least 5 of these have been posted in the past few days. I'm a luddite, I'd have implemented the API and not bothered with the front end at all, but that's just me ;). (Redreader is a good mobile API client, and I think Gnus can also talk to the Reddit API).
I like this. A nice QoL improvement would probably be to add an alternate card view where images/videos are expanded by default; that's usually how I browse Reddit.
I'd be curious to see if the "no pornography" rule hinders growth at all. While I don't have actual numbers, I know from personal and second-hand experience that quite a lot of Reddit's (or the internet's in general) traffic is porn-related.
In any case, I hope this platform takes off and succeeds. I think a non-profit alternative to Reddit would be awesome.
Another Linux Firefox user chiming in to say I can't use the site. Permanent loading animation, developer menu reveals a hidden "You need to enable JavaScript to run this app." message that isn't appearing, even though JavaScript is enabled.
Thank you for checking it out. I will make sure firefox is supported, I don’t see why it won’t work out of the box, but I’ll investigate and roll out a fix asap!
Hey, just wanted to follow up and say the site is working normally on my Windows Firefox! It looks good!
My only question/quibble is that I'd like to know if there's a setting to make the site full-width. I'm used to old reddit and hackernews being heavily text-focused and I hate seeing my webpages letterboxed into the center 1/3rd of my monitor.
Other than that, I'm a big fan! Hope it takes off. Just made an account and a community!!
Of course, that makes complete sense considering reddit is having a blackout for the next two days so people are hoping to capitalize on the turmoil. Definitely the best time to launch a competitor though they have a very steep hill to climb!
I don't use mobile, so I can't comment on that, but I can compare to old.reddit (the classic good version).
Overall it is decent, but there is still plenty of work,
Here are my comments, ignore if you don't agree.
----
Content loading: Initial Page
old.reddit.com loads fast all content, without javascript. flingup.com instead is stuck on 5 blue bars bouncing because no actual content is loaded on first page. It is all loaded on some delay for some reason. Here is a thing: render content on backend, and if it is expensive, render it and cache it.
The only good thing is that flingup uses own subdomains, unlike reddit that uses other domains like redditmedia.com / redd.it / reditstatic.com . I hate companies that use alternative TLD because it is hard to discern if domain is real, or used by scammers.
Additionally, only 2 javascripts are needed to load flingup, and they are hosted from realm.flingup ... the other 4 seem to be some form of bloat. Basicaly, there is an iframe that loads something from realm.flingup on port 8443 and this iframe loads two javascripts. If these are so critical, why are they loaded through an iframe? why port 8443? why realm.flingup ? Sigh.
the good part, despite flingup being js based, it supports middle click / control click on links correctly, unlike plenty SPA. But not all items, can't middle click to see user profile, instead user has to normal click, which does some odd useless popup with an actual button to see user profile.
----
Content look: information density at 30%
old.reddit.com gives me 29 items I can see concurrently on my screen. Flingup only shows 9.
----
Content look: almost no comments loaded (25% of 40)
I will ignore the fact that most items are just links, not discussions. But lets use the top link "migrating from reddit" as example. It has some odd 40 comments, but only like 10 are loaded, because the remaining are hidden behind a series of 'there are 3 replies'.
Contrast this with old.reddit that will load 500 comments, up to ?8? levels deep (I counted up to 8, maybe more?) with a button to 'load more comments' either in a thread, or at bottom.
Paradoxically, my other complaint is no option to collapse uninterested thread, or to link to specific reply (aka permalink)
-----
Content: tooltips missing
I dislike the '2 days ago' as it doesn't say when. old.reddit provides actual time of a comment / post when user hovers over '2 days ago'. Flingup doesn't.
If you want a reddit-like that runs w/o JavaScript I am working on BrutaLinks, a federated link aggregator and discussion platform. An example instance is at https://brutalinks and the code is on SourceHut: https://git.sr.ht/~mariusor/brutalinks
Tech stack:
keycloak (auth) dot net core 6 typescript + react react router 6 bulma
I plan to open source both the backend API and the frontend client.
API documentation: https://api.flingup.com/swagger/index.html
A penny for your thoughts? Comments?