I'd want to downvote this, but in absence of that option I'll comment here instead to show I disagree.
First, although he's indeed also reading the article, it's not like that is the only thing he is doing. He is adding a broader perspective to it.
Secondly, the tabloid fodder accusation here is really not any value here, please don't make HN commentary second into something where they just sling random accusations around.
Third, I agree that it's not just some podcaster as stated by the other commenters.
Also, the first line of the video description of the video is a link to the medium article.
Also, the first line of the video description of the video is a link to the medium article.