D's design goals attempt to combine the performance of
compiled languages with the safety and expressive power
of modern dynamic languages. Idiomatic D code is
commonly as fast as equivalent C++ code, while being
shorter and memory-safe.
D seems to have similar goals with Go (golang). Has anybody here used both?
The site is amazingly fast (at least subjectively), even though there must be a higher traffic coming from HN. Has anyone inspected the code to see how it's done and if there's some kind of a web framework for D?
While there are equivalents available for interpreted/CGI languages (e.g. opcode caches, memcached), there is still a significant performance advantage. With a warm cache, most pages can be written out in under 5ms, and the busiest in under 50.
For some perspective, the time needed to compose the busiest view (threaded or split-view) halved when I moved from naive string concatenation to an optimized appender.
Yes, there are way too many things hard-coded at the moment. I want to refactor all of it out into templates, config files and library code. There's apparently some interest of adopting some code into D's standard library, too.
The core team never went dormant. There was a point where the community seemed to have contracted sharply, back before 1.0. Is that what you mean? If so then yeah it seems to have turned itself around.