Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Haven't looked at the project yet, but some thoughts based on OP:

"Even lock-free algorithms will not be parallel enough. They rely on instructions that require communication and synchronization between cores’ caches."

Azul's Vega 3 with 864 cores/640GB mem (2008) with Azul JVM apparently works fine using lock-free java.util.concurrnt.* classes & would appear to be a counter point to the very premise of the OP.

It is also probably more likely we will see new drastic rethink of memory managers and cooperation between h/w and s/w designers (kernel /compiler level). Right now, everything is sitting on top of malloc() and fencing instructions. What is more painful? Write non-deterministic algorithms or bite the bullet and update h/w and kernels and compilers? See Doug Lea's talk at ScalaDays 2011 ([1] @66:30)

And this is not to mention anything about FP and STM approach to the same issue.

[1]: https://wiki.scala-lang.org/display/SW/ScalaDays+2011+Resour...

Cliff Click's presentation on the subject are quite enlightening. Although, Azul's hardware and target are quite different from the 1000-core tilera idea. I doubt it is a counterpoint to Ungar's message.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact