It isn't really the ACM, the authors got their paper accepted with a funny name, which isn't uncommon practice.
Goto considered harmful or programming with bananas and barbed wire also got quite a popularity thanks to their unconventional naming. It is in some cases clearly abused.
Also, you need to read the abstract in full to understand what it's about, a cursory reading feels like buzzwords from completely unrelated domains.
A real title could be "Fooling biolabs security measures with audio waves embedabble in popular music".
Also, you need to read the abstract in full to understand what it's about, a cursory reading feels like buzzwords from completely unrelated domains.
A real title could be "Fooling biolabs security measures with audio waves embedabble in popular music".