I left Aurora serverless (v1, v2 pricing was insane) for PS and I've been extremely happy. It was way cheaper and less of a headache than RDS and my actual usage was way less than I anticipated (since it's hard to think in terms of row reads/writes when working at a high level). With PS I get a dev/qa/staging/prod DB for $30/mo vs spinning up multiple RDS instances. Even with Aurora Serverless (v1) where you can spin down to 0 it was cheaper to go with PS. 1 DB unit on Aurora Serverless (v1) cost like $45/mo (for my 1 prod instance) so for $15 less I got all my other environments without having to wait for them to spin up after they went to sleep.
My usage is way under some of my sibling comments but it's a been a joy to use and $360/yr to not have to worry about scaling my DB, backups, schema migrations, and now caching is a steal for me. Could I run my DB on a $5/mo DO box (or similar)? Probably, though I'd probably want at least the $10/$15 size box for when my software gets a little more load. Even if I knew for sure I could run on the $5 box I'd still rather pay $30/mo to never worry about my DB and the schema migration tool is awesome.
My usage is way under some of my sibling comments but it's a been a joy to use and $360/yr to not have to worry about scaling my DB, backups, schema migrations, and now caching is a steal for me. Could I run my DB on a $5/mo DO box (or similar)? Probably, though I'd probably want at least the $10/$15 size box for when my software gets a little more load. Even if I knew for sure I could run on the $5 box I'd still rather pay $30/mo to never worry about my DB and the schema migration tool is awesome.