Hacker Newsnew | comments | ask | jobs | submitlogin
tnicola 903 days ago | link | parent

"In one Dutch study, participants were put in a room with posters proclaiming the awesomeness of high-definition, and were told they would be watching a new high-definition program. Afterward, the subjects said they found the sharper, more colorful television to be a superior experience to standard programming. What they didn't know was they were actually watching a standard-definition image. The expectation of seeing a better quality image led them to believe they had. Recent research shows about 18 percent of people who own high definition televisions are still watching standard-definition programming on the set, but they think they are getting a better picture."

They are actually getting the better picture. One cannot argue that modern TV SD is not better than what we used to watch on CRT's. Everything has improved, so it is a better picture. HD is mostly undetectable to human eye to make that much of a difference. At least to me. Wide screen SD is a sufficiently pleasant experience.

My husband claims to see the difference. I think he's conditioned to see it.



nitrogen 903 days ago | link

[Warning: HD evangelism ahead]

It really depends on how far away you sit from your TV, what the screen size is, and how good your vision is. When I'm sitting three feet from my 28" HD monitor, you bet I can tell the difference between HD and SD. My vision's not quite 20:20, though, so on the couch 15' away from a 100" projector screen, I'd have a hard time telling 720p from 1080p just based on sharpness, but the larger size of any macroblock artifacts would give it away.

In the right conditions, I'm positive you'd see the difference, too. Try renting both a DVD and Blu-ray of the same movie from Redbox, and watching them a little closer to the screen. The Blu-ray will let you see more individual hairs, individual distant bricks, etc. But even SD on an HD screen can be better than SD on an SD screen, due to increased pixel density and reduced flicker.

-----

chadgeidel 902 days ago | link

I would be careful with this comparison. Many BluRay disks of older movies are just upscaled from the DVD (I'm guessing here - not actually sure how it's mastered) and aren't significantly different than what you would get with an upscaling DVD player.

You would have to get a "recent" movie mastered specifically for BluRay to see the difference. I've done this several times myself (specifically "The Princess Bride" - which appears to be an upscale, and "How to Train your Dragon" which is significantly clearer).

-----

tnicola 902 days ago | link

Vision clarity definitely plays the part. And so does how far you are from your TV. I am about 2.5 screen lengths away from the screen and the point is, it isn't that much better that it warrants all the inconveniences that come with watching an HD.

It requires another player. (In case of BluRay) It's harder to stream through the internet. (In case of digital formats)

For those people, like me, who in 95% of practical uses do not see the difference, the above disadvantages make it a no brainer.

I guess I am asking, is it really worth it all the trouble?

-----

nitrogen 902 days ago | link

If you consume HD content the "legitimate" way by inserting a disc into a Blu-ray player, then no, I don't think it is. You have to put up with 7 minutes of unskippable previews in some cases, player updates that take two hours to download and install, two minute load times on two-year-old players, etc.

If you front-load the inconvenience by buying the discs, ripping them all to a hard drive, and using something like XBMC or Plex on an HTPC, then for any serious watching where you sit down for the whole show, yes, it absolutely is worth it. I wish more people had access to the convenience a media server gives; it's what content should be like in the digital age.

Edit: I'm usually about 1.5 screen lengths away, so that probably makes a difference.

-----

X-Istence 903 days ago | link

I don't think that he is necessarily conditioned to see it. Seeing the difference between a BluRay movie and a DVD movie is very clear (at least to me). The BluRay movie has sharper edges, its motion is clearer and the image pops more.

Could it be simply the difference between the camera technology then and now? Maybe, but even between the same movie in BluRay vs DVD I have been able to tell the difference, my dad for instance put in the DVD instead of the BluRay disc by accident and I asked him if he used the BluRay disc or not about 2 or 3 minutes into the movie.

-----




Lists | RSS | Bookmarklet | Guidelines | FAQ | DMCA | News News | Feature Requests | Bugs | Y Combinator | Apply | Library

Search: