> Why don’t you post the data you’re referring to so we’re on the same page?
Like, you want me to link to it? I wouldn't know the URL off the top of my head. That is an oddly specific thing to memorize.
> Something tells me you won’t show any that supports the quoted assertion.
No doubt. You can tell someone is just looking for a fake argument when they start asking for someone to have memorized an arbitrary URL that is likely a deep path structure and not reasonably memorizable.
> By the way the quoted assertion has nothing to do with income stagnation.
Especially when they think they have it all figured out, free of misinterpretation. The intent of what I said has everything to do with income stagnation. If you have interpreted it differently, I'm not sure what to tell ya.
Should I be concerned that you don't believe me? You've mentioned that a couple of times. I guess I'm not clear on what value you are trying to add to the discussion.
Like, you want me to link to it? I wouldn't know the URL off the top of my head. That is an oddly specific thing to memorize.
> Something tells me you won’t show any that supports the quoted assertion.
No doubt. You can tell someone is just looking for a fake argument when they start asking for someone to have memorized an arbitrary URL that is likely a deep path structure and not reasonably memorizable.
> By the way the quoted assertion has nothing to do with income stagnation.
Especially when they think they have it all figured out, free of misinterpretation. The intent of what I said has everything to do with income stagnation. If you have interpreted it differently, I'm not sure what to tell ya.