Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Religion + pyramind scheme. Most bitcoin evangelists are heavily invested in crypto, and stand to personally gain from their missionary work.



Only as long as more and more people buy in and price goes up so they can cash out, into fiat of course, their sworn enemy they seek to destroy.

If price goes down, just tell everyone to buy the dip.


I don't really think this everyone's goal anymore actually, It is shaping up to look more like 'purchase some now, such that it takes you a slight bit further in the future'.

People like paying each other with Paypal. Unless they don't, and they prefer Zelle. Unless they don't, and they prefer Venmo (which I think is crypto based now). Unless they don't, and they prefer Monero.

Its possible my perspective on this is too moderate, since I'm not a crypto-basher, but also not a huge crypto fan. However, I really don't get the vile hatred for crypto on this site. Some of the crypto currencies are quite good, with the support of privacy, smart contacts, app integrations, etc. For as many people here that enjoy the backup of simple static webpages, sharing of data, etc, I would think a project encouraging data sharing on e.g. ipfs, should be celebrated here.

Instead, if anyone here gets a quick whiff of the word 'crypto' they're quick to dismiss it without ant consideration.

It seems to me that people who don't like crypto are equally as guilty of assigning it to their identity in a religious way.


>It seems to me that people who don't like crypto are equally as guilty of assigning it to their identity in a religious way

And where did I do that? I've pointed out that the majority of BTC strength lies in the critical mass of people speculating on it increasing in value and attracting more people in when it does, further inflating the bubble. That's why everyone I know online and IRL bought in, the FOMO when they saw the crazy returns others made (by cashing out into fiat of course so they can actually spend their gains).

>People like paying each other with Paypal. Unless they don't, and they prefer Zelle. Unless they don't, and they prefer Venmo (which I think is crypto based now). Unless they don't, and they prefer Monero.

Please, Paypal and crypto payments are not the same. With Paypal you still pay and receive fiat at both ends of the transaction.

Back to my main point, people keep tooting that BTC is a payment method but I have seen no evidence of mass adoption for that uscase in most of the west and the number of users who actually use BTC for (legitimate) payments is minuscule, due to the high transaction fees and low adoption of it as a payment method, compared to the mass of big and small HODLers that's just using it for speculative gains a.k.a. gambling, gains which are turned back into fiat in order to be spent into the economy, further defeating the point that BTC is a viable currency.

The taxman does not, nor the car dealers, nor real estate agents in my area take BTC payments, only EUR. When that will change then I'll grant you that BTC is more than a FOMO driven speculative pyramid scheme.


>where did I do that?

It's mostly just the unwillingness to have a moderate view towards these currencies. Everyone on HN seems to have blind hatred steering the discussion, rather than admitting that it may fail, or may become the main transaction currency in the future, or (more likely) somewhere between - such as becoming the major way in which large banks and institutions transfer currency between countries.

It's strange to me that people are using the argument of what behavior of crypto see right now will be how crypto will continue to be used in the far future. Unfortunately it got misconstrued in recent years to be an 'asset' rather than currency, but it's still possible for it to return to being seen as more as currency.

It could remain the same or change - but I don't see why everyone is so hatefully polarized over it.


And where exactly did I show blind hatred or unwillingness towards a moderate view?

I gave you my arguments why BTC is now just a Ponzi scheme and not a currency or a good legal payment system, while you have not provided any kind arguments to support BTC as a payment system or as a currency and instead just complain that people have a blind hatred and what not.

So I'm all open for a moderated discussion but you need to bring some arguments to the table not just complaints on the participants.


This is literally how fiat currency works. Sure a government can pass a law saying so and so is the official currency but as you see in many minor countries they still use USD or Euros. Without buy in from the population fiat currency can also be left ignored.

The value of USD is also a pyramid scheme and entirely depends on demand from everyone to keep it's value. The federal reserve is only one small actor creating demand.


The value of USD is underpinned via demand manufactured through taxes. Crypto has no equivalent of taxes so it is almost entirely reliant upon perception. This is partly why HODLers are so aggressive in defending the perception. It's possible to literally "talk" their wealth into worthlessness.

There are countries that use USD but with the exception of ecuador (where you pay taxes in USD) i cant think of one that uses it exclusively.


You're comparing a single country market to the entire world market. They are inherently different.


I am? I don't really see how.


US taxes (as base demand) are only paid by those interacting in the US market. Bitcoin base demand is international.

Anyway they are totally different assets with their own trajectories and influences. We don't know what will happen in the future.

What I do know is Bitcoin is deflationary while USD is inflationary by their nature.


>US taxes (as base demand) are only paid by those interacting in the US market. Bitcoin base demand is international.

This is nonsensical. More USD is traded internationally than bitcoin.

The value of USD for somebody living in Paraguay stems from a demand for US goods and services A) supplied by people who pay US taxes or B) supplied by client states of the US (e.g. saudi oil) who kind of also pay USD taxes in a roundabout way


I think you're getting a little off topic here. Whatever demand exists for USD there's a ton of sources in the world to supply same said USD that isn't the united states because as we all know it's a world reserve currency... This helps the USA because it makes it possible to print a ton of money and the inflation gets absorbed by all world wide holders of USD instead of just Americans. This keeps inflation way down while they print more money. But even so $1 is worth less and less everyday. Bitcoin has no such problem. It's deflationary. As long as there's a floor to it's demand it will continue to go up in value. Nothing in the past 9 years has disproved this concept.


If you think demand is beside the point and inflation is everything then you'd probably consider exchanging every dollar you have for a deflationary shitcoin.

And many do.


The value of USD depends on trust in the US government and economy, that is not a pyramid scheme.


It is until it isn't. The base demand for USD comes from the federal reserve. Bitcoin has a similar base for it's legit uses (like international currency transfer) so both have a demand floor. After that it's all dependent on use and further down market demand.

I think when we all are dead future generations will see crypto as a basic value store like gold. No one will call it a pyramid scheme either cause it would have been around since before they were born.


I always internalized the base demand for USD as being the only accepted currency to pay your US income taxes in.


Yes, and some currencies do lose value because the government and economies backing them have lost trust.

The demand for USD comes from people wanting to do business with one of the biggest economies in the world. The demand for Bitcoin comes from people wanting to make money by hoarding Bitcoins.

It could be different, but right now it is not and I'm not sure if Bitcoin (or any other cryptocoin) would survive a transition to become a currency or something else less like a pyramid scheme.


You're kinda dismissing it without respecting that it's no different from gold as far as people wanting to hoard it. People also do use Bitcoin when convenient to move money. I personally used it to pay someone in Brazil for some mechanical keyboard services when PayPal failed to transfer the money. Totally legal and organic demand exists.


Have you compared the gold price with the Bitcoin price?

I'm not saying it Bitcoin could not be like gold, I'm saying right now it is not and everyone in it doesn't want it to be. And I'm not convinced it ever will be.


I'm thinking in the long long term of hundreds of years. Seems to me when we start exploring space moving around heavy chunks of metal won't be so useful anymore and we'll need to use a Blockchain to verify value transfer.


While I agree we will probably want something different from the current status-quo when light-lag gets big enough to matter for normal daily financial interaction, one potential solution could be to go back to local banks holding money locally, just as things were here on Earth before ATMs and cheap telephony.


We haven't been using heavy chunks of metal as currency for a while without a need for blockchains. I see mostly disadvantages compared to government backed currencies.


Yes and No.

To someone who doesn't live in the US, the value of USD mostly depends on trust in the US government and economy.

To someone who does, the value of USD mostly depends on whether or not the IRS will be asking for their due next April, whether or not their landlord/bank will be expecting a rent/mortgage payment next month, and whether or not the grocery is stocked with toilet paper.

It is true that if any of those three things don't happen, you have far more serious problems than 'what currency you use'.


>To someone who does, the value of USD mostly depends on whether or not the IRS will be asking for their due next April, whether or not their landlord/bank will be expecting a rent/mortgage payment next month, and whether or not the grocery is stocked with toilet paper.

Or in other words: trust in the US government and economy.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: