Hacker Newsnew | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit login

Interestingly, Japan has spent loads of time on manufacturing robots and personal service robots of dubious utility (see Asimo, Toyotashi and others), while the U.S. has dumped military money at robots and ended up with drones, bomb disposal robots, exoskeletons, etc. etc.

While I agree that the level of technology and packaging in Japanese robots in generally higher than U.S. counterparts, to take a rather cheap shot, it was U.S. drones and robots that were first on the scene.

Due to the pedigree of mobile robotics, the U.S. needed systems that worked now and not the future...resulting in a variety of heavy duty operable robots capable of working in difficult environments.

Here's arguably the most advanced robot in the world handling perfectly normal stairs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASoCJTYgYB0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASoCJTYgYB0

Conclusion? Make the robot more like a crappy old American robot. http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2011/08/hondas-asimo-to-a...

It's critically important PR for the Japanese robotics industry to respond to Fukushima with something of utility. Otherwise these decades of work and millions of Yen in R&D haven't amounted to much more than an interesting series of public demonstrations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wwB43D0FG8




Human-form robots : robots :: Space Shuttle: ICBMs. It's just a media-friendly way of demonstrating that you have the capability to produce something of use. Most robots look nothing like a human. The overwhelming majority are in industry.

Interesting you mentioned exoskeletons. The US is 5 to 10 years away of getting them on a battlefield. They're commercially available in Japan for medical use. (I'm not making a value judgement on that, except to the extent that "You could actually buy this" is superior to not being able to buy it.)

-----


Interesting you mentioned exoskeletons. The US is 5 to 10 years away of getting them on a battlefield.

Actually that's a very good point, and a fascinating demonstration of the differences in commercial funding for a technology vs military funding and the similar but completely different kind of tech that comes out of that.

-----


It's more of a technical issue, isn't it? They need to figure out how to power it— that's a lot easier in a hospital than in a war zone.

-----


For reference, when Japan's Fukushima number 1 NPP reactors started going pear-shaped, there was no robot in Japan that they could use to enter the facility.

They had to turn to either a US or French robot to enter the reactor.

-----


The bulk of the work was done by low-wage laborers wandering polluted water in sneakers. Asimo was out busy playing football.

-----


I'm not whether this serves as a proof of problems with Japanese robotics.

If Japan builds robots for the factory and the US builds robots for the battle field, it seem logical that US robots would be more useful in nuclear disaster. An power plant leaking hard radiation after a hydrogen explosion does resemble a battle field more than a factory floor, after all.

-----




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: