Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Right. Too stable. That's the problem.

The number you've "predicted" is "the age of the universe", which isn't constant. Unless you can show why this particular instant in time is especially interesting, then it's just another number, no more interesting than any of the other numbers you generated in the process.

Can we consider a few other possibilities?

As in, taking the point of view of cosmology about 100 years ago, before the redshift was attributed to the Doppler effect. And before the notion of a big bang was the default basis of reasoning.

- What if H is just a measure of redshift? Literally just redshift. Not expansion. Not an age. Just photons losing energy. At a rate of H.

- What if H actually is constant? Like G and like h and like k (Coulomb's constant).

- What if the universe doesn't have an age?

^ not rhetorical questions. Actually asking.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact