Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Unless this means "sure, the result was already cached in memory" I don't see how you can be 10000x faster than Clickhouse. This claim is too big.



Actually in their example, no data is processed.

The query compiled to a loop over natural numbers that was optimized by the compiler:

uint64_t x = 0; for (uint64_t i = 0; i < 1000000000000; ++i) x += i;

print x;

This loop is completely eliminated by compiler optimizations.

But it does not make much sense to run these queries in SQL :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: