I was interviewed by the Wall Street Journal around 2000±a year or so about Wingdings when there was a moral panic about what happened if you typed NYC in the wingdings font (I was editing a typography magazine at the time which is how the reporter found me). I patiently explained that the arrangement of characters in dingbat fonts is generally arbitrary with patterns generally dictated by character code more than anything else and that as someone who knew Chuck Bigelow and Kris Holmes, I could vouch that they were not, in fact, anti-semites.
(There was an article I read, I think in the Chicago Tribune, around that time which indicated that by having my name appear in the newspaper I had slightly increased my probability of being kidnapped. My probability, according to their formula, was still less than 1% and true to form, I have yet to be kidnapped.)
I disagree with the arbitrary arrangement of characters.
If you write NYC in Webdings, you have an eye, a heart and a skyline, which I read as "I love New York". Could be a coincidence, but very unlikely IMO.
> Following the controversy over possible anti-Semitic messages in the Wingdings font, Connare intentionally rendered the Webdings character sequence "NYC" as an eye, a heart, and a city skyline, referring to the I Love New York logo.
Thanks, I always assumed (without checking) that Webdings preceeded Wingdings and thought this would have been a tasteless easter egg of a font designer. If Wingdings existed before Wingdings, all this makes more sense.
I was thinking about why Wingdings, a popular phenomenon in Word docs, didn’t translate into the web, chat, and mobile SMS until the iPhone let us add the Japanese emoji keyboard.
The technical difference that I can see is that Wingdings is mapped to English letters (I.E. the same code points), whereas emoji are mapped to their own code points. So while Wingdings are typed using the standard keyboard, emoji (still today) requires a dedicated program/menu/keyboard to select them.
Additionally, font is often ignored/lost in transmission, in things like email, web text boxes, SMS. So what made emoji just work is that it used unique code points, not reusing other characters’ code points.
I suspect your “additionally” part is in fact the main reason. Emojis in Japanese phones were transmitted not by font information, but dedicated code points like Unicode. East Asian SMS systems need to implement multi-byte encoding for “real characters” anyway so it’s considerably less friction to add some fun ones. That’s much more difficult argument to make if you’re designing a system for the American audience.
> East Asian SMS systems need to implement multi-byte encoding for “real characters” anyway so it’s considerably less friction to add some fun ones. That’s much more difficult argument to make if you’re designing a system for the American audience.
It definitely helped, but the reality is that the carriers also have (had?) complementary e-mail services provided for free or low-cost, which was uncommon in the rest of the world (especially in the '90s and early 2000s!). For example, au (part of KDDI) had implemented their emoji (before standardisation) using image tags.
In 1996 at my first job as a programmer, the company had a system where the password field in the login screen was obscured by using wingdings as the font. :)
nice! I worked at a place in 1999 that had an RTF file on a public share that had the passwords for everything. It was ok because it was encrypted with wingdings...
PCB CAD software Altium doesn't have a way to import vector images for PCBs - but it DOES have the ability to put vector TrueType font text on them.
So if you need to put a UL/CE/FCC/ROHS logo on your board? Altium recommend you use the special 'mooretronics' font [1] where common symbols have been lovingly converted into the glyphs of a TrueType font.
I have only used it as a font in the 3D Text screensaver. Set the screensaver to display the time, max speed and use one of the Wingdings fonts. It confused the hell out of people. :)
You can still do that in Windows 10. I just tried it and discovered that the screen saver settings dialog looks like it hasn't been touched in about 20 years. It still shows the screensaver preview in a CRT monitor frame...
I wonder that's related to the fact that screen burn in stopped being an issue with the wide adoption of LCDs. People still certainly continued using them as habit, for enjoyment, or due to default settings - but its true purpose went out with the CRTs.
Well, it's not like low quality LCDs don't suffer from burn in like effects, either. But the way the screen saver settings have been hidden away suggests that this feature is pretty much on life support. It's just much better to send the screen into standby.
Image persistence can potentially be a thing with some LCDs but I honestly don't remember seeing it for years now even in the most brutal edge case scenarios.
Early Macintosh systems had several such fonts, including Cairo and Mobile. The icons in those fonts were a lot weirder than Wingdings or Dingbats -- where else can you find a font which includes glyphs for a fried egg, an ankh, a frog, and a dogcow?
