Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It doesn't matter what you think is investigative journalism.

What Assange did is investigative journalism... as proven by Bellingcat, that literally bought private phone, flight, bank and train ticket data on private individuals to show how FSB tried to kill Navalny.



well bellingcat went (and still goes) looking for information, sources and then publishes article on those stories, which is not exactly what Assange did, which was mostly making confidential documents (sent by a variety of sources) available to the wider public


They also publish their source materials and how they obtained them.

Writing summary articles is not the definition of journalism.


that still doesn't make what Assange did "investigative journalism", unlike what Bellingcat does


It does, so stop trying to be the "ultimate authority on what is investigative journalism"


and you are the one, to claim it was? Because nothing you wrote changed my mind on whether or not Assange did investigative journalism. Some journalists did use the documents that Assange released into the wild as a basis for their investigations, but that's not what Assange did


Assange first provided the cables to newspapers like The Guardian, Der Spiegel and El Pais, so that they could write articles about them. After they had had time to work through the material and write up a series of articles, WikiLeaks published redacted versions of the cables.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: