Are you shitting me? You're asking me ... on one hand to "trust the science," to the point humans change our use of power, transportation: basically upend industrial civilization, but you're also telling me this "science" isn't capable of producing models accurate enough for geoengineering? You do realize CO2 mitigation is only one form of geoengineering, right? If they can't suggest another one, why should anyone listen to them regarding CO2?
You can't have it both ways. Either "the science" predicts something or it doesn't. Which one is it?
You can't have it both ways. Either "the science" predicts something or it doesn't. Which one is it?