Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That is a single person. Have those been peer reviewed and scrutinized by the wider medical community?

If you open the study, you'll see there are open-labeled non-randomized trials he is referencing.

It's been a handful of months since COVID-19 grasped the globe. Too early to take things as gospel. As we are finding out in this thread, these types of studies are open to bias and rife with mistakes or misinterpretations. If we are to take the desired lesson from this thread, it's that data surrounding these medical journals need to be highly scrutinized before we can take them in as evidence.




No, that is ongoing. Here are a collection of studies. (Not complete). The comprehensive studies that will satisfy your criteria are being carried out by several national and international bodies (including WHO). One will need to wait till September end. Contrary to all US media propaganda, WHO did NOT cancel all HCQ studies - only the solidarity trial in specific was cancelled.

http://www.ijmr.org.in/preprintarticle.asp?id=285520

https://swarajyamag.com/insta/icmr-study-reveals-four-or-mor...

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.27.20073379v... https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758v...

The older HCQ study wrt SARS: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

Document of a collection of studies (a bit biased - please don't be irritated) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq...


>No, that is ongoing. Here are a collection of studies. (Not complete). The comprehensive studies that will satisfy your criteria are being carried out by several national and international bodies (including WHO). One will need to wait till September end

So in other words, unproven.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: