Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You can use a language like OCaml without allocating and still capture huge benefits over C++, like a decent type system, ADTs, and better abstractions than templates (modules in OCaml's case).

What about multicore? :)

Nowadays Rust seems to cover all those features with zero-cost abstractions.

You still need to write non-consing code to avoid memory allocation/deallocation latency, just as if you were working in Java, Lisp or OCaml.

(In fact, GCs can often give you better latency than malloc/free unless you go into custom allocators with object pools... which is part of writing non-consing code in GCed languages)

Ah you're right, I forgot about OCaml's ass-tier multicore support. Rust is definitely better there.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact