Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If 10% of the population needs ICU and dies because they cant get it, then there is no business as usual.


You make a valid point.

At the same time, economic problems affect everyone while it seems that covid-19 harm scales with age.

No easy solutions to be sure, but I have hope more data becomes available soon so we can implement more nuanced policies to achieve similar containment while preventing massive unemployment. Testing random samples of the general population would be a good first step.


In Italy, median age of people who have died of Corona is 83 for women and 79 for men [1]. Normal life expectancy is lower than that in the United States [2]. Lockdown measures will have severe impact on GDP, and GDP is correlated with life expectancy [3].

It can easily happen that by killing economy in order to save lives, we may actually be doing the opposite in the long term.

[1] https://www.iss.it/web/guest//comunicati-stampa/-/asset_publ...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expe...

[3] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/life-expectancy-vs-gdp-pe...


Normal life expectancy is lower than that in the United States

I read on your link that average life expectancy in Italy is 83.4, about 4 years more than US (at 78.9). So I don't get your point unless you are speaking about the age structure: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_age_str...


The US might not be the best country to benchmark other developed countries against, so.

Personnaly, I have issues with people using economic data, read money, to define the value of other peoples lives.


It's not just 83 year olds on the ventilator. What's the economy going to be like with millions 'working from hospital?'


That's an "if" though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: