Excellent article! The technical details and references are impeccable and your example images are great.
While talking about Dionysius Thrax you might add that the term obelisk as an editorial mark (used to denote parts of the text that were deemed to be added later) is mentioned in the scholia of this work, while discussing the legend of Peisistratus.
OK, I can't resist, I'll paste an excerpt myself:
"At some time the poiemata of Homer were destroyed, either by fire or by earthquake [...] But Peisistratus, the strategos of Athens, wishing to acquire for himself a reputation and to revive the works of Homer,
devised this course of action. He announced throughout the whole of Greece that anyone in possession of Homeric lines should bring them to him for a fixed premium per single line. [...] and after gathering together all the lines, they summoned 72 experts (grammatikoi) to assemble the works of Homer, each one in private,
in whatever manner he might consider the assemblage would be best. He [Peisistratus] summoned them for a premium that was fitting for intellectual men and kritai poiemata, and to each was given all the lines in isolation, as many as had been gathered together."
This, AFAIK, is the first mention of editors/scholars performing style analysis for authorship determination.
Thanks for the positive comments! There are two more articles on the pilcrow coming soon, and after that I'm moving on to the interrobang. I hope the new entries live up to the first one!
I'll echo the other positives - very interesting and enjoyable read, looking forward to the next parts. If there was enough for a book at any point, I can think of several friends that would also enjoy it.
Cheers for a brilliantly composed article! Looking forward to the interrobang - I'd never heard of it until the Oatmeal gave it a shout-out recently. Don't worry about the articles "liv[ing] up to the first one" - you're obviously thorough and articulate, so I wouldn't say you have too much to fret about!
It's too bad that it's in multiple parts and the other part(s?) aren't available! It's a surprisingly well written and researched article. I'm looking forward to more entries.
Tease! You started out by saying you would get to the name and shape of the Pilcrow in this article, but you never quite got there. Oh well I guess I will have to wait for part II.
I loved the style of the piece, the flow of the writing, the look of the page.
He just never got to the dang point! Perhaps this is all part of an elaborate plot to keep us interested. I hope so. Looking forward to more work from this author.
Wow. That was an amazing post. Having a penchant for ancient greek due to misplaced enthusiasm for seminary, I was seriously enthralled. I didn't realize I might have a latent typography fetish.
I always find it surprising how little the Greek language has changed. As a modern Greek, I can easily understand the text from the Codex Sinaiticus image (apart from the damn wordsbeingwrittenlikethis)...
That's partially attributable to the legacy of Katharevousa, which was basically Ancient Greek with simplified grammare. During the two centuries of Katharevousa's official use, a LOT of heavily Ancient Greek-inspired vocabulary migrated in to the vernacular.
Firefox 3.6.13 on Ubuntu massacres the typography (at least with my DPI/hinting/smoothing settings). The lowercase letters are not uniform in height. Chrome looks much better.
Now I know why Homer's writing is so awesome - The Iliad and The Odyssey weren't just written to be read aloud, they were written TO BE FREAKIN' SHOUTED.
While talking about Dionysius Thrax you might add that the term obelisk as an editorial mark (used to denote parts of the text that were deemed to be added later) is mentioned in the scholia of this work, while discussing the legend of Peisistratus.
OK, I can't resist, I'll paste an excerpt myself:
"At some time the poiemata of Homer were destroyed, either by fire or by earthquake [...] But Peisistratus, the strategos of Athens, wishing to acquire for himself a reputation and to revive the works of Homer, devised this course of action. He announced throughout the whole of Greece that anyone in possession of Homeric lines should bring them to him for a fixed premium per single line. [...] and after gathering together all the lines, they summoned 72 experts (grammatikoi) to assemble the works of Homer, each one in private, in whatever manner he might consider the assemblage would be best. He [Peisistratus] summoned them for a premium that was fitting for intellectual men and kritai poiemata, and to each was given all the lines in isolation, as many as had been gathered together."
This, AFAIK, is the first mention of editors/scholars performing style analysis for authorship determination.