Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Some Google Photos videos in backups were sent to strangers in November (9to5google.com)
405 points by midef 13 days ago | hide | past | web | favorite | 138 comments





The usual argument for using "cloud" over managing your own files/data is that it's very hard to safely manage your own data without making mistakes (data loss, etc). However, this is an example of how companies like Google also make mistakes. Furthermore, when Google/FB makes a mistake (like leaking your private data) they do it at a global scale.

I offboarded myself from all of Google's services a while ago, but I also think "cloud" is dead, at least in the cases where the cloud service holds the encryption keys on my behalf. I don't trust, and never will trust, any company to hold on to my data without either selling it to a third party or accidentally leaking it.


Everybody makes mistakes and nothing in the world is black and white.

The only question is, is your cloud provider less likely to make mistakes with your data than you are?

For most people, the answer is going to be orders of magnitude less likely.


The other question is, what is your cloud provider going to intentionally do with your data without your consent.

define "your data" because from their perspective, the data they collected watching you through a window, is their data.

> The only question is, is your cloud provider less likely to make mistakes with your data than you are?

No, the second question, which is a multiplier of the first, is how catastrophic the mistakes can be. Google _can_ accidentally do much worse things with your data, but it probably much less likely to make mistakes with it in the first place.


Yep. If I screw up, then the worst case is pretty much that the data is gone.

If the cloud provider screws up, then the worst case is that my video goes viral and lives on the internet forever.

It isn't hard to imagine some troll finding he got some embarrassing video via takeout and putting it up on reddit for everyone to see.


Other worst cases - you leave the firewall wide open, and some script kiddies steal the photos, replace them with kiddie porn and refer you to the police.

This is a risk regardless of where I store my data. If I have a machine with any local storage of any kind at all, then someone could break in and store stuff there.

So this is not a differentiator between storing your own data in the cloud and locally.


Just encrypt your data before putting it onto somebody else's computer a.k.a. the cloud.

Exactly, the solution of the problem is to only give encrypted data to cloud companies. This way they cannot collect any additional information from your data.

And when the average user forgets their password?

Then their data is gone. Now you just have to figure out what's worse for you. Somebody else getting your data or losing your data and you know whether encryption is for you.

Put the password in escrow somewhere when you start.

How do you secure the escrow?

Don’t be the average user.

That’s a very dismissive attitude. If you want to make the world a better place, you have to accommodate the average user; One can’t say, “you’re not smart enough for our service.”

If you’re serious about the security of your data, you need to know how to pick a password you will remember. There are things in this world that we ask of average people that are far more difficult. In 2020, picking and remembering a password should be table stakes at this point. It’s not 1997 anymore.

The key word there is “if.” Most people don’t care about the security because they’re unaware of the risks involved. Stories like this blow over in a week or two.

Most people don’t want to lose their stuff because they forget a password. That’s why unencrypted data and password resets are a thing.

What we as tech people should be doing is educating and helping those people. Set your family up with a NAS for local backup and have it mirror to, say, Backblaze. Set your parents/grandparents up with a password manager. Etc.


Easier said than done:

- If you share something, you need a way to share the key

- Things like a truecrypt drive work poorly with file sync clients


For most people, self hosting their own data isn’t even an option. For the subset of privacy concerned people who have the technological knowledge to self host, making mistakes with their data is not “orders of magnitude less likely”.

> For most people, self hosting their own data isn’t even an option.

I'm trying hard to invalidate this with PhotoStructure. My goal is to be installable and usable by even my least-computer-savvy family members.

Although there are desktop installers, users can move their library to a NAS, rPI, oDroid, NUC or a VM in the cloud--anything that can host 64-bit docker images--but only if they want to. Everything in your library works cross-platform because I didn't want to be tied down to any OS or hardware.


How are photos added to the library? I had a quick look through the PhotoStructure website and it looks interesting, but I haven't seen this answered. For me the appeal of Google Photos is that all my phone's photos get uploaded when I'm on wifi.

PS: There's an image that can't be loaded on the confirmation page when registering for email updates.


> How are photos added to the library?

PhotoStructure imports files that are available to the device that it runs on: local files and anything mounted via a network filesystem (like AFS, NFS, or SMB/CIFS).

I use SyncThing or Resilio Sync to send my phone's photos and videos to my NAS. When I'm on vacation with limited bandwidth, I add a sync node on my laptop (which is connected to the hotel WiFi), so my phone syncs quickly to my laptop next to me, and then through the course of the day, the laptop syncs back home.

Although it's certainly more convenient to have everything wrapped into one app, I think there's an appeal to being able to choose the tool that works for you. (In other words: it's much less code I have to write and maintain--writing battery-efficient, stable background jobs on both iOS and Android are a PITA!)

> There's an image that can't be loaded on the confirmation page

Are you using ublock origin or a pihole? Those block most images coming from mailchimp.


I see, thanks! And yes, I agree on the app part. Which is where Google Photos' value lies for me as it is rock solid in that department.

I'm currently running both syncthing and Google Photos to store my photos. syncthing is great once it works, but it is definitely not something I would expect a family member to be able to set up.

In any case I'm very much looking forward to see where PhotoStructure is going. I've set up a reminder to give it a try.


FWIW, Resilio Sync has a desktop version that's easy to set up (a QR code pairs your devices, and you don't have to do anything to your router).

Is PhotoStructure a web app, or something else? I looked through the website and signed up for the beta, it seems interesting and is going on my list of possible Google Photos replacements.

It's a web app. I've packaged it up with Electron, but you can also run it via docker or even directly if you've got node installed.

I'll be sending out instructions to my next wave of beta users soon.


Only because you're thinking as "self-hosting" to be setting up a server, etc. Before cloud-connected security cameras, every cam system owner was "self-hosting", even if that mean the cameras just recording to a local box.

> I don't trust, and never will trust, any company to hold on to my data without either selling it to a third party or accidentally leaking it.

This is a very black and white way of looking at trust. Trust is earned, it can be broken, it can be rebuilt. All human relationships are built upon trust, and it is fallible just like anything else. To have trust is to create vulnerability. However, just as you mention, that vulnerability comes with an upside.

What you are saying is: because there is vulnerability in trust, you should trust no one.


> All human relationships are built upon trust

Relationships with corporations are not the same as human relationships. Being open with other humans is part of the human experience.

Being open with special legal entities that we have fabricated as societies for economic gain is justifiably questionable.


Even so, I'm not convinced that trust can be completely rebuilt. Maybe it varies with the person, even in human relationships.

Most direct human to human relationships don't come with a 40 page privacy policy and terms of use that they reserve the right to change on a dime. A rational stance is not to trust anyone that requires you to agree to a bunch of legalese without having a lawyer review it first.

Or why trust someone if you don’t have to. Why do we have locks on doors and store passwords as hashed strings? Trust sucks.

I get an absolutely endless parade of other people's data to my gmail account. Doctors send me MRI scans. Bankers send me foreclosure notices. Airlines send me tickets. Undertakers send me condolences. The preponderance of evidence suggests that relying on individual vigilance on a large scale does not work as well as relying on the vigilance of large organizations.

I assume that this not because Google is midirecting email, but rather because your email address is quite close to that of others.

Mine is just my last name @gmail.com. It is a rather uncommon name, and I've met many others with that name, as I've accidentally received email intended for them.


> Mine is just my last name @gmail.com. It is a rather uncommon name

I'm in the same boat. And uncommon, but not rare. I've gotten emails intended for my brother. One time, I got a collector emailing about something with a rental car crash that I previously got confirmation email for. Recently, a Dutch woman discovered email and think she has my email address. It's amazing how many websites don't verify email addresses.


Some asshole bought a Lexus and entered my email address. I now get his loan statements and service reminders, on top of the advertising. They are all from noreply@, of course, and I would need to know the password to the account to unsubscribe. Sure I could reset it, but I'm not actually sure if it's legal?

If Eurocrats really want to save the Internet they'd fine companies for sending anything to recipients who haven't been double-verified.

What does “double-verified” even mean? Though, in case you were wondering, GDPR requires continued consent for companies to use your email address; they have to delete it if they don't keep getting permission to keep it.

"Verified double opt-in" is a term of art in the world of email. It means you provide your address to consent to emails and you confirm the address with a link sent via email.

https://mailchimp.com/help/about-double-opt-in/


Your comment is quite anecdotal I would dare to say, and anyway the scope of single individuals messing up is quite, quite smaller than the scope of $LARGE_COMPANY. Even if you sum all those individuals.

Lol.

The potential impact of a large company screwing up is massive. The risk is lower.

I would assert that the probability of an individual overexposing their own data in any one year period is probably close to 75%.

In my neighborhood, 5-6 cars are broken into every week, because the owners don’t lock the doors. If a process that simple isn’t handled well, folks aren’t handling more complex/abstract processes.


How do I leak my email or photos from my local machine? And if I do, then I'm likely still leaking my local cache/copy even if I use cloud.

> How do I leak my email or photos from my local machine?

Click the 'not now' button when your browser or OS pops up asking you to install a patch.

Open <celebritynude>.jpg.exe.

Download pirated software that is infected with other malware.

Visit dodgy websites in an overly permissive browser in order to stream some media without spending money.

(Most people, myself included, are guilty of at least one, if not more, of the above)


"I get an absolutely endless parade of other people's data to my gmail account."

Same. Part of it is just incorrectly addressed emails sent to my primary address. The other flood of emails I receive is on a domain where I've got a catch-all, and I regularly receive emails intended for recipients on a similar domain.


Your experience is far different than mine. In 15 years I only got probably like 2 accidental emails.

Is your email something like john@gmail.com?


My email is firstname.lastname@gmail.com. Both my first and last names are not super common, but off-late I'm seeing multiple people with the same combination when I google my name. I get bank statements from 3 different banks, job offers and even the occasional nude selfie - all intended for someone else. I have tried to reply, click on unsubscribe links - but nothing seems to work. It stops for a few days and it starts again.

I'm somewhere in-between your experience and the parent's. I've had 2-3 instances where it appears that someone put my email address on their account by accident, and I got their auto insurance claims, etc. There was no "click here to verify this is your address" email sent for those.

I also got a lot of email for a high school reunion where the school was named after someone who shares my name... And people routinely left off the numbers in the email address, ending up with mine.

The rest of the not-mine emails all look like phishing attempts to me, and not just mistakes made by some office worker.


I have firstname + two letters @gmail which rarely gets wrong email but then back from the nineties got firstnamelastname @ Hotmail.com which properly get at least one misdirected mail a month.

But if I host myself I have to trust both my own IT skills and the one FOSS maintainer that provides the software...

Google Photos is pretty great though. My use case for it is that even though it's private, I assume that any photo on there could become public.

I, too, was a fan of Google Photos in the early days. But I've decided that privacy is more important than the convenience of its syncing feature. You never know how that data might come back and bite you in the future.

I have an iPhone but I don't use iCloud's backup or sync feature either, I just store my photos locally. I backup my iPhone to my iMac, and I backup my iMac to my Synology NAS in my closet. I try to keep my private data private.


One of the favorite features I have of the Plex Server, is that the Plex app will automatically back up photos on your phone to your Plex server, which can run on Synology as well (mine's on an ODroid HC connected up to a multi-TB drive with backup drive).

As someone for whom this was a bridge too far, thanks for the information. This is a useful alternative to pull it local and still get the syncing that was the reason I let Google photos mostly do as it pleased after I got a Pixel.

Our Plex AppleTV app has begun aggressively pushing its own content lately. It’s a nuisance to navigate to where our personal content is now

I've submitted a feature request to the Photos app team for syncing to a network share as an alternative to iCloud. The Files app recently got network share support so here's to fingers crossed that Photos can get it too.

Edit: I want Photos app to have this feature. Other apps can do it on iOS but they have to play location services shenanigans to get it to work in the background and I don't do that. The Photos app has special abilities.


Do you use any remote backups? What do you do in case of a fire?

Not everyone thinks this way, there is an expectation of privacy in the minds of most users.

What did you replace Gmail and GDocs with? I've successfully moved to Firefox and DuckDuckGo, but am struggling to get off Docs and Gmail.

Fastmail for mail, and I use git for most document-type storage. If I absolutely need a spreadsheet, I just use Apple's Numbers which is mostly crap, but good enough.

Another vote for Fastmail. They also have a very simple one-button import option for your gmail emails. The web UI is fast and simple. I love it. I tried ProtonMail, but there are numerous drawbacks because of full E2E (Must use their email clients on mobile, web client on web and bridge on desktop. Migration from ProtonMail requires to use their beta software. Full text search doesn’t exist - yet).

Another vote for Fastmail!

Fastmail is good but I bet the Australian government is vacuuming up everything you send/receive. I’m considering ProtonMail again now that there is calendar

Word online is free.

I use Restic Backup to backup to a supported object storage and now setting up another provider (or VPS which will be slightly tricky) via Borg Backup (for the same data). The most important of that (~1GB) gets backed up to Tarsnap too. And once copy gets backed up to my local hard disk.

Once a while if I have to share any photos with some friends I send them an iCloud link and then remove the photos once they have either downloaded or seen.

I know there's a risk of losing the data if I forget/misplace the key(s) and my hard disk dies (at the same time) but then I could forget my Google credentials too, or worse still (with a higher probability) I could get locked out of my Google A/c and I don't know any Googler, neither do I have too many Twitter followers.

It's been worth it and once setup it's been running smoothly for over a year (across 2 laptop changes/data migration).


It's not "dead" if everybody but you still uses it.

For consumer products, the cloud makes perfect sense. Scaling, performance and orchestration make it a perfect fit. And who cares about the few things that fall into wrong hands here and there...

Our business, on the other hand, works closely with government agencies, insurance companies and similar institutions, and the cloud is an absolute no-go. All sensitive data on-premise on the intranet. No need for change.

I believe many people are not aware yet, that things in the cloud cannot be controlled, or they consciously accepted that. Many companies won't take this risk.


> And who cares about the few things that fall into wrong hands here and there...

I surely hope you are not in charge of any consumer-facing cloud storage products.

Everyone cares.


I would like to say that Nextcloud, while it is not trvial to set up, is very very good at helping you set up the server securely. They additionally have a way to testing your server to make sure you did set it up, and helps you to correct issues.

I would love to see Nextcloud create a "time machine" type box, where it runs both as your router and as a "home cloud" service. That way it would be much easier to configure it as a public facing service.


I haven't used Nextcloud, but I'm excited about a future of Notcloud products.

The only problem is that the server is written in PHP, which has had a history of bad RCE bugs (and an RCE bug in this context means all your personal data is accessible). In addition, NextCloud has had several pretty bad bugs related to authentication (such as bypassing 2FA, by pressing "cancel").

Don't get me wrong, I still use NextCloud, but you can only access my instance through a VPN (or by being on my home network where my server runs). I would suggest that everyone else does the same if you're hosting your own data.


Do you recall which RCE bug and when?

I have been using it for 4 years, and I recall one in the past year, but Nextcloud was loud and clear on making sure you had to upgrade. It was even nicer with auto updating on Debian, I didn't have to do anything to get my server patched (I just went in to confirm it was patched).


[1] shows 143 code execution CVEs in the past 20 years. Now, to be fair, this site has been known to misclassify bugs in the past and it's likely that most of those bugs don't apply to NextCloud or weren't even RCEs.

However it's hardly unheard of for PHP to have RCEs. Usually the RCEs are in programs written in PHP, but PHP itself is hardly blameless. For comparison, Python has had 5-10 code execution CVEs in the past 10 years.

And again, I'm not bashing PHP or NextCloud here. I would probably also firewall NextCloud if it was written in Python. The only thing protecting your data from being public is a single service that you are running and gated by a basic login form -- I personally feel much safer with it behind a WireGuard VPN.

[1]: https://www.cvedetails.com/product/128/PHP-PHP.html?vendor_i...


That’s a well known fact and they even promise 99.9X uptime in their service.

The usual argument is that Google is less likely to make mistakes than the average Joe managing his own infrastructure.


Google introduces a different set of risks and failure modes. It may shut down the service you are relying on. It may lock you out of your account for confusing reasons.

Which isn't to say that you shouldn't use it, just that you are exposing yourself to different risks, and you should take steps to mitigate those risks. Primarily by duplicating your data other places.


What do you use for email over Gmail?

I used Fastmail until they randomly deleted a large chunk of my emails and the support followup was abysmal (one email a day around 4am EST) with no ability to recover, explanation or apology on their part.

It was the push I needed to set up a Mailinabox instance. It was a breeze to install and has been working great since I spun it up four months ago.


As a recent convert from gmail to fastmail, this scares the hell out of me. How long did this go on before you pulled the plug?

I am not Australian/located in Australia so I would have about as much recourse with fastmail as I would with google (ie. none).


Emails were deleted August 23rd, across a wide variety of folders, all at the same millisecond (when I later pointed this out and how difficult it would be for me to do this accidentally, they did not comment).

Noticed on October 4th. I'd noticed some emails weren't turning up in searches but I chalked it up to my bad memory until there was one I knew for a fact should have been there. It was Oct 22nd by the time we got to any sort of conclusion, which was basically "there's nothing we can do for stuff that far back but I'll try to restore any recently deleted emails we can find". Getting details/logs/info from their support, even after they escalated to a higher level, was like pulling teeth.

They restored a bunch of things I'd actually deleted but they were all stuck in Draft mode, took till Oct 31st for them to sort-of fix that mess.

I set up the Mailinabox somewhere in that period. I still have my fastmail account because I wanted some overlap to test the MIAB before committing, and I'm getting ready to fully pull the plug before my next billing cycle.

It was a good lesson in setting up regular backups and not trusting any provider. I found Fastmail great to use until that experience, and I could see them being useful as a relay to send through trusted servers, but not worth my money to deal with the terrible support.


This is really unfortunate. I've been using Fastmail alongside Gmail and thought about switching over completely to the former at some point, just haven't come around to doing so yet. I'm glad you shared these details -- always good to know how organizations respond when things don't go as planned, as opposed to what's stated in their marketing materials.

Where are you hosting Mailinabox? I've always wanted to use it instead of gmail/fastmail but all I find are the generic use DigitalOcean, etc tutorials and I'm wondering what somebody actually using it has it set up with, what are the specs? Thanks in advance!

I had an extra Linode instance (Nanode 1GB: 1 CPU, 25GB Storage, 1GB RAM) laying around that I'd previously tried to manually set up a mailserver on. So I just reset it to the OS/version Mailinabox specifies, ran the install script and followed the rest of the instructions (https://mailinabox.email/guide.html)

It really doesn't need much, and the guide is very complete. Took me a Thursday evening plus some waiting for DNS propagation.


Not OP, but I use Mailbox.org. They have a neat feature where you can give them one or more PGP public keys and they encrypt the bodies of all plaintext emails to those keys. It's not perfect (you're still trusting them to not be compromised) but it means even if your account gets taken over, your email history remains private.

Microsoft Exchange Online. $4/month for Exchange push email to my iPhone/iPad/Apple Mail(our Outlook). 50 GB of mailbox storage.

Not blocked by anyone as it's a legit provider. Have been using it for years with my own domain.


tutanota here. It's pretty good and cheap - except missing ICS import/export for calendar which is annoying.

I use fastmail. I'm a happy customer.

Didn't Australia like pass a bill or something that compels corporations like Fastmail to give the government any and all encrypted communications if they ask?

This is one of those stories that had no relevance in actuality, yet gets brought up in nearly every single mention of Fastmail: The bill applied to a requirement for backdoors/the ability to decrypt data. Fastmail was never E2E encrypted in the first place (like Gmail, Outlook, and most other major mail providers), and hence, Fastmail was always required to comply with lawful requests for your data.

It’s always relevant because the world has a good idea how the Australia treats data privacy and security. Their elected officials are shooting their tech sector in the gut

It seems from another world when I see people paying with money for products. I don't know why, maybe because I'm very cheap, but I'd never do this when I can pay with my data.

Opensmtpd is very easy to set up.

Runbox.com

Mailbox.

Fastmail.

So far it seems that Google is notifying the people who received videos that weren't theirs, not yet the people what had their video leaked.

> Google has been sending emails to affected Takeout users. In the email, which was first spotted by 9to5Google, Google writes, "Some videos in Google Photos were incorrectly exported to unrelated user's archives. One or more videos in your Google Photos account was affected by this issue. If you downloaded your data, it may be incomplete, and it may contain videos that are not yours."

> While this message is directed to Google Takeout users who tried to download their own data and accidentally got someone else's, we've yet to see a message directed to the "unrelated users" whose videos ended up in the archive. We've asked Google if it plans to notify users who have had their private videos exposed, and we'll update this article if the company responds.

From https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/02/google-photos-bug-le...


The way I read it, it seems that only Takeout users were affected, on either end. Either way, this still needs to be made explicit for the sake of transparency.

How does this happen? I realize it's a small percentage, but this is one of the first tests you build. Even 1 photo (not to mention this is regarding videos) should never make it to another non-authenticated user. This is a massive mistake.

I don't work at Google (any more) but I have seen bugs in large-scale production that served one user's data to another user, and both times it had the same cause: a developer stored user-specific data into a process-global singleton because the consequence of some java decorator was non-obvious. When the next user request came along they were served the previous user's information.

[flagged]


Guice is evil and should be eradicated, but it's probably easier to get rid of Java itself.

I think, when discussing software, the phrase "should never" just doesn't belong. I have only a short software career, but of all the bugs and unintentional behavior I have read about failures small and big companies make, I am no longer surprised.

For that matter, software itself is full of surprising and undefined behavior, so it really shouldn't be a surprise that large corporations sometimes have "simple" mistakes that appear really big. That is just software in motion.


Unintended software behavior exists on a spectrum and a great deal of it is preventable by learning from past mistakes. It’s unfortunate we don’t have more information about the nature of the underlying this issue.

I once witnessed something similar. Deep down in the repository code there was a field marked `static`, which should've been an instance property. The value would be overwritten by the last user to access the repository; so this resulted in a race condition where one user might see the other's data.

One way I've seen this happen is images have UUIDs (or just incrementing), they're base-64 encoded somewhere after security checks, and someone accidentally called `toLower()` on the id.

Going from 22 base-64 characters to 22 base-36 characters still only drops you to about 113 bits of entropy. Unless we're talking significantly more than a quadrillion images in the system, getting a collision on a 113-bit random ID is exceedingly unlikely.

I strongly suspect there were more problems in the system than just toLower(), or else the system was hosting significantly more than a quadrillion images. Your mention of "or just incrementing" sounds much closer to the mark.


I once witnessed a very similar bug. The story was a comedy of errors:

1: I interviewed a HORRIBLE candidate and told my boss in no uncertain terms not to hire the bozo. Then, I look at my colleagues and explain how poorly the interview went.

2: I go away for two weeks to have surgery

3: I come back and learn that we're hiring the bozo

4: My boss asks me to do some pair programming with the bozo, and he doesn't understand some very basic concepts

5: I hear the bozo is debugging webservice code in production

6: We had a data leak from one of the bozo's bugs

From what I remember, it was a very dumb bug based on clear misunderstanding of fundamentals.


They had one job!

Don't store your private information in the cloud unencrypted. Caching bugs frequently leak unintended data.

This makes sense for backups, but for something like photos, there's a lot of value-add you're missing out on. Something like sharing a photo with a friend becomes an ordeal.

This is a nice platitude, but frequently most b2c client apps that use cloud storage (eg Google Photos) give no option to encrypt data clientside for storage.

Which is exactly why you shouldn’t use them.

Considering this is 4 months later... This can't have been very widespread. If I saw someone else's video in my takeout archive, I'd have totally contacted the tech media...

Honestly, I would not have noticed if a bunch of someone else's videos were on my takeout archive - I've downloaded that takeout archive multiple times as a backup, and I've browsed some stuff there (a fraction of the total) once to see if the things I care about are there, and that's it.

For all I know, your videos might be in a zip file on my external HDD I use for backups, and I'll never know unless I need to restore data after some disaster and that's the latest takeout that I have.


What if it was a celebrity? This kind of thing could have been used for blackmail

It would be nice if they could tell you what photos/videos were sent to strangers.

Logging is really locked down due to GDPR stuff... Which ironically means the privacy laws means they've deleted the specifics of the privacy violations that occurred.

Does anyone have suggestions for a self hosted photo service with - importantly - a solid iOS companion app to do photo sync and possibly browse photos?

I would prefer using a simple S3 backend. It seems that finding a reliable photo sync'ing app for iOS (outside of Google Photos or Dropbox) is difficult.

I've been manually using Image Capture and uploading to S3 but that's quite inefficient. Thanks!


Not S3, but self hosted by NAS and can push encrypted backups to S3 - Synology Moments? https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/feature/moments

I find Nextcloud pretty great. There's a sync client available on f-droid. It also has capabilities for calendar and contact list synchronisation, so you can move that off your google account.

It came preinstalled with my instance of mail-in-a-box (https://mailinabox.email/), which is an easy way of hosting your own email. With my self-hosted instance of mailinabox and LineageOS my phone is completely google-free. :)

Edit: And it has a decent iOS sync client as far as I know.


Not self hosted but mega.nz has a really good photo syncing app and all data is encrypted

Thank you, the great iOS app and end-to-end encryption really sealed the deal. Also being able to try it out with the 50Gb included in the free account...!

I'll be moving backups there. Maybe I can run a weekly / monthly rclone to sync Mega to S3 to have some redundancy.

Thanks!


Check https://lomorage.com, you can host in your home network using raspberry pi.

Interesting that the bug was in Takeout, which might have a fair amount of privacy concerned users that were trying to leave Google. Guessing some caching or "generate a unique url" type bug.


I've seen services (Google Photos, Dropbox, OneDrive) try to opt in the user to having data automatically uploaded when they take a not really related action (like logging into the google account on their phone, connecting a USB device, or misclicking on an icon in their file list). I do wonder if there's any penalty that'd apply to them if they then lost data that users hadn't realised was being uploaded?

I posted this here a while back, some super-weird compilation of what appeared to be a random video showed up in my Assistant.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20373112

Seems like something similar. Ie, someone else's weird crap was used by my account's Assitant to make a compilation/summary.


I'm pretty sure there's a huge number of these CCPA/GDPR implementation bugs. I know of a couple myself.

This is big, and has GDPR fine written all over it. And I'm sure this will not be the last time we hear about this.

Also, very curious to learn more of the technical details down the road?


Does gdpr forbid mistakes?

Well, it wouldn't do a lot of good otherwise, since I'm pretty sure most data breaches aren't committed deliberately. The point is you should have measures in place that prevent those sorts of mistakes.

Not mistakes as such, but it'll probably invite an audit wherein they'll assess what strategies they took to mitigate a potential issue like this. If they're found to be inadequate and it also impacted a resident of the EU then maybe they'll slap them with a fine.

no, but "In the case of a personal data breach, the controller shall without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, notify the personal data breach to the supervisory authority competent in accordance with Article 55"

Well, at least they will have to make sure they performed due diligence with testing- because a test would reveal this pretty quickly. You know real testing, not using customers as Guinea pigs

If you do it by accident, you pay a fine. If you do it knowingly someone should go to jail. It's time to hold those tech companies to a higher standard.

no, but it does mandate to notify the people affected by the error/breach/fudge up. I wonder if they would have notified anyone if it wasn't for GDPR.

Google respects your data just as much as Facebook does.

Now that's spicy. Were people receiving random videos? Was this being targeted to retrieve videos of specific users through an exploit?

The wording suggests random, or at least from the end user pov.

This is a catastrophic issue and it's terrible Google have sat on this for so long.


Somewhat relevant: host your own web applications easily

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22231922 Reviving Sandstorm (sandstorm.io)




Applications are open for YC Summer 2020

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: