This article was shit from the get go, here's a list:
The title was shit:
>Why are engineers so narrow-minded? New research has an idea.
The research is not new, the research he and the hbr.org article are citing is from 2007. It's also important to mention the findings are about the perception educational environment itself not and not in the workforce. If there was new research I couldn't find it links to the papers.
The very first sentence of the body was shit:
>I could make a viable argument that engineers are swiftly destroying the world.
Yet he neglects to do so, and also fails to mention that it's the people using the technology that are destroying the world, not us.
The second sentence is even worse:
>Naturally, I won't, as they can be very sensitive souls who stream uncontrollable invective like many people stream Netflix.
So in order to make himself immune to any reasonable argument that he knows would refute his weak-ass claims he just says that all engineers would be critical of it anyway - shut up and accept him and the psychologist findings as gospel.
The worst part is that the older research isn't bad, though I'm unable to find the newest research that should be easily viewable inside of the hbr.org article (seriously, where is it???), the older stuff seems reasonable, it's the zdnet.com writer's snide asshole commentary inserted everywhere while pulling bits and pieces from the research to come to incorrect conclusions.
This drivel seems to be ending up on the front page more often. Please stop upvoting it.