Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
JobFunnel, a job website search aggregator (github.com)
160 points by paulm7242 19 days ago | hide | past | web | favorite | 37 comments



Unfortunately, a job search aggregator assumes that companies religiously post new jobs. The reality is when a company wants to hire it 'may' post a job to cover it butt in case of an EEO complaint. Mostly they have internal candidates, internally referred candidates, retained recruiters, applicants from career website who all rank above an external job site. My guess is a very low percentage of jobs actually get filled by job aggegator sites. imho The number of applicants from these sites is just too much, far less qualified and trusted compared to other sources.


Oh man, I love how this works. Everyone's time gets wasted, and then the applicant gets the shaft and a bullshit excuse.

Either companies shouldn't be required to post publicly with the intent of hiring internally or an employee getting a referral kickback, or something needs to be figured out where the applicants aren't taken advantage of.


Conservative HR/Legal departments will often post jobs publicly to avoid a discrimination lawsuit from the EEOC.

The federal government can (and routinely does) ask mid-sized to large companies for records of their job applicants to "prove" they are not discriminating against protected categories (women, minorities, the disabled, etc).

So if the CEO/hiring exec wants to hire his good old boy friend to a position no matter what the job will still be posted and applicants will be collected even if they have no chance of being hired.

Obviously I have no data on how prevalent this practice is but I've witnessed it firsthand, so it happens.


I was always under the impression job sites don’t like to be scraped. What are the risks in using a tool like this? I would suspect possibly getting your ip banned.


As always, consult a lawyer.

But, my understanding is that you are allowed to scrape sites as long as you don't impact their ability to deliver the site to other users. In other words, don't DDoS them. Sites tried to ban scraping but last I remember seeing it was not enforceable unless it was done at high rates or maliciously.

As for content, certain things like recipes aren't protected content because they are "listings of ingredients". I can imagine a job opening / title might follow that same logic, maybe the job requirements and benefits as well.

What is protected is the way it's presented and organized. So if you have the same jobs with the same filters and same layout you might be exposing yourself to trouble. You have to make changes in the way it's presented, which for copyright law is changing 50% or more.

So if you're scraping a job site and only showing remote jobs or jobs in a certain skill set, or you're showing the job along with some stats about the company you're probably in a safe spot. But again, if you want to make a business out of it it's probably good to talk to a lawyer first.


I don't think the question was: "is it legal to scrape", rather: "do they like to be scraped". If they wanted to, I'm sure they could make scraping harder (more annoying). Which, I suppose, thus comes down to: is being aggregated a net plus or minus for their business. Probably "it depends" on what the aggregator does with the data. So, just to get this pun in: it then comes down to: is being aggregated a net plus or minus, IN AGGREGATE.


Then no, very few for profit companies like to be scraped.

It would be easier for them to provide an RSS feed or a free API if they wanted to share their data.


This is indeed's business model - certainly that's what the big uk recruitment sites thought.


Yeah I was under a similar impression. If not, this is great as I am currently looking


Somewhat related freecodecamp.org had a video for aggregating job results with a filter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lauywdXKEXI&t=196s


Anyway I can automate applying for a job now. That would be the ultimate tool to complement this.


I work for a job search site and our customers have huge problems with "mass appliers" who just apply to every job and hope that one is an actual fit.


Its not unusual that a dev job get thousands of applications. But what should the job seekers do? If you do the math the work seeker has to apply for 1000 jobs to have a statistical chance to find a match.

The market doesn't work because its unbalanced. For example on a dating site where women do not reach out to men, the women will complain about the low quality, and the men has to mass message. Leading to very few matches.

It the employer would however actively search for candidates the market would be more balanced, and lead to more matches.

The problem is that instead of looking themselves, employers use recruiters. What if there would be recruiters in the dating market. That wouldn't work at all. You would tell the recruiter that you want someone that is intelligent and kind. But you still dont get any matches. Because you dont know what you want until you see it.

Im thinking of like an expo where workers show their skills and portfolios and the employees show what they are working on and the problems they are solving.


You can already improve your statistical chance by pre-filtering jobs based on required skills etc. Say, you end up with a list of 10 out of those 1000 jobs and then apply to those. Depending on how active your job hunt is, you might even spend 15 minutes per application and tailor your CV to the job description (use the same keywords, highlight relevant experience, the regular stuff). You would already have greatly improved chances and you would not be what employers have a problem with.

Remember: If they are able to hire you without a recruiter they save a LOT of money, so they WANT you to apply directly.

Btw: The problematic mass-appliers I was refering to are the ones that apply to every damn job on the entire website. Yes, we have those. No, I don't understand their motives either. The only thing they achieve is work for the job site and the HR department, ultimately resulting in the usage of automated pre-filtering that also harms actual applicants.


How would you automate, would you just send your resume? I've been thinking about building a developers only job site and was thinking that developers would really love the idea of auto applying but I don't know how to avoid low quality matches.


Actually, that would be so cool...

Like you could configure a few different resumes (Front-end heavy, Python focused, large company, small company) and apply to a buttload of jobs.


Until there is a "Standard" job application I don't see that happening


This wouldnt be that hard to do, but is it illegal to automate those submissions?


May not be illegal, but all platforms don't like it. And it's only a problem that needs solving because the internet is full of shit content.

There are N amount of job postings, but recruiters and other "middle-men" have made it so that there are N * X * Y places a candidate has to apply to.

Where X are the amount of recruiters and Y are the recruitment platforms/boards.

They literally take their clients' requirements, shuffle them around, repackage them, adding editorial fluff and then post them to Y amount of platforms. This is information warfare and we are losing the battle.

This is the net-consequence of all the "distributed" effects we've been wanting for years. Instead, there should be one database. Or at the very least an identifiable entity even if you want to repackage something. I.e. each one of these postings needs to have an agreed UID for employer, employer's job posting, recruiter, and the type of roles it applies to. We need more structure to the data, not less and more distribution across the greater internet.

That is why they don't like scrapers, because they lead to consolidation, aggregation or deduplication of data that has been needlessly duplicated in order to confuse and obfuscate.

On a side, tech-related note, this is the same reason why I hate microservices architectures: a good chunk of them distribute and duplicate pieces of data.


I think it would be messy, but doable, to build a one application platform that is tailored to individual websites behind the scenes. It knows how to input the information, checks the boxes, and then collates the responses and makes applications easy to track. Actually kind of curious why this doesnt exist


I don't see why it would be, as long as you're just sending one real job application. If you tried to DOS a company by sending in a ton of garbage applications that'd probably be illegal.

That said I wouldn't be surprised if you get declined if the company realizes you did so.


Who's with me to automate the coding interview with leetcode problems?


This is essentially what large job sites like Indeed do themselves, but they have entire teams maintaining the scraping pipeline. I've worked for one of their competitors.


One pet peeve I have with sites like indeed is all of the subterfuge that goes on. For instance, the half-assed sort by date feature. Indeed adds in month old sponsored postings with new postings, and often repeats those old postings on consecutive pages. Many sites also shamelessly reset their posting dates so that nothing is ever more than a week old.

Stripping away the middleman's ability to manipulate the presentation of search results is the most attractive feature here, in my opinion.


One thing a multi-site scraping aggregator could do would be detect listings that have been re-posted with just a date change, and show the real amount of time the ad has been up, alongside how long it's been most recently refreshed.

It would be interesting to search for ads that were posted a long time ago and are still unfilled.

And it would be intersting to see how that add "posted 12 hours ago" is the same one that was posted 6 months ago and is currently being posted by 5 different recruiters with almost identical wording apart from their boilerplate.

And it would also be interesting to see the different salaries/ranges that are mentioned on different copies of the same ad. I've noticed different recruiters sometimes post the same ad, but with a different salary ceiling. Guess which number I'd like to have when negotiating... And if I see a job whose salary has been creeping up for a few months, that's an interesting trend too.


It's also largely what the DirectGov website in Britain does. They have an entire team working on maintaining the pipeline. I haven't worked for one of their competitors, though.


Awesome to see in the screenshot that this is from somebody in Kitchener-Waterloo!


I wonder how this would be if it was backed by Elasticsearch.


Very cool OP!


At https://remoteleaf.com, we have been doing this manually to curate remote jobs.

I spend more than 6 hours daily searching for, screening, verifying and filtering hundreds of remote jobs. So it can save you time, energy, and frustration – and hopefully, help you find a job faster

I'll check out this tool at least for the scrapping part.


When I look at your signup form I can't really find my profession. I had this problem for a while now but maybe I should simply ask: I do industrial software engineering (in my case in automotive) that targets a mixture of embedded, desktop and server environments. This is done mostly in C/C++ with some Python, Shell and maybe Rust. What is the proper profession name for me? Is this a full stack engineer? Not likely from what I've seen but I really don't know


I agree and I'm not sure either. Maybe if you are interested I can modify your category in the backend and set it to a custom one and start sending your C/C++/Embedded development remote jobs.


I just took a look. Nice looking site, by the way :-)

I have the same issue at signup as the GP - I find myself rather unsure what categories make sense for me on your signup page.

Similar to the GP, a mixture of embedded, servers, and webdev, except I wouldn't say I do just industrial. Feel free to look at my LinkedIn profile (the link is in my HN profile) if you think it could give you some ideas for additional categories on your signup page.


Based on your skills, I would suggest choosing the Javascript and System/Devops categories.


Thanks for that! Armed with the advice I'll take another look.

Though I think that, on the face of it, completely leaves out my interest in compilers, programming languages and toolchains, and in kernels/devices/embedded systems, which are a big part of my work in practice.

Maybe the "System" in "System/Devops" covers that, but those two are a peculiar match: I've might quite a few devops workers who consider software development to be slightly outside their knowledge, and something like C or C++ programming to be "very advanced". I find it peculiar that anyone can do devops without being a competent programmer but hey, it takes all sorts!


It's fine, I'm not actively looking right now (I really like the website and your manual approach though).

I'm just wondering wether non-web dev jobs don't exist anymore or are just out of fashion/not mentioned that often


[flagged]


Most people can't do that or will gladly not do it if a service like this saves them the bother.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: