All extensions in this field are very limited by all major browsers' security policies which prohibit, for example, user-defined keybindings on a blank tab. I found more satisfying mouseless experience only with specially crafted browsers like qutebrowser. But they come with their own troubles :( Would be really great for FF, and Chrome(ium) to make keybinding assignment more flexible instead.
> All extensions in this field are very limited by all major browsers' security policies which prohibit, for example, user-defined keybindings on a blank tab
This is the correct answer. Attempts like these futile.
You can not properly control the UI while a page is loading which makes the UX godawful. Try closing a tab or switch while the current tab is loading. Sometimes it works, other times not. With legacy VimFX you coulf also access all buttons in the browser UI toolbar.
Was a VimFX user and the switch to WebExtensions was the greatest step back in browsing I've ever experienced. Tried to remedy this by running legacy extensions in Pale Moon. But that's not a way forward as these alt browsers are not secure. Actually, I'm toying with the idea of sandboxing alt browsers to be able to browse fast with my fingers on the keyboard again.
Ha, you're here! I ran your updated versions in WaterFox for awhile. Was very happy and it worked perfectly. Thanks! I believe I read something back then about WaterFox eventually also phasing out XPCOM extensions.
Did not know about the shim. Will give it a try. You just gave me some new hope. Thanks again!
I'm running Pentadactyl in Waterfox[0], which is a fork of the last good Firefox incorporating security updates from new Firefox. I can't vouch for how secure this really is in practice--perhaps the whole plan is a fool's errand--but it certainly works fine.
> Try closing a tab or switch while the current tab is loading.
Simple: use the default shortcuts for this. The normal shortcuts coming with the browser out of the box are always available. Yes, they are not as nice to use as vim-bindings, but they are working.
Vimperator / Pentadactyl gave a fantastic experience on Firefox. But the recent transition to WebExtensions killed them, which is really sad.
It's the only major regression I have ever experienced in my computing workflow. There's no good replacement, as browsers that provide a good keyboard-driven experience come with their own troubles as you explained.
Tridactyl is currently the best (Vimperator / Pentadactyl)-like extension around. It seems to be nicely done and is in TypeScript (and Python for the application (native messaging) part). You might want to give a try, if not already.
I use tridactyl and it isn't bad. I use the standard hotkeys to navigate forward/backward or to switch between tabs (unless I want to move to a far-away tab then i'll use 'b' so I can type in it's name to select). Because, as you said, the extension hotkeys don't work while the page is loading.
However, it works great for what I mainly use it for-- navigating up/down a page, and using f/gF/F to select links and open them or open in a new tab.
It seems that a lot of people are upset at browsers limitation's with custom keybindings. I thought I'd mention qutebrowser (https://qutebrowser.org/) which is a browser built using Qt (blink behind the scenes) around custom keybindings.
> It seems that a lot of people are upset at browsers limitation's with custom keybindings. I thought I'd mention qutebrowser (https://qutebrowser.org/) which is a browser built using Qt (blink behind the scenes) around custom keybindings.
> I'm using it right now and it's pretty great.
Is it your daily driver or do you use it in addition to Chrome/Firefox?
Not the perfect solution, but I use NewTabTweaker [1] in FF set to redirect new tabs to DuckDuckGo. It works pretty well in combination with SurfingKeys, although I do occasionally need to use default FF keybinds, e.g. when a page fails to load.
The alt combinations (other than alt+esc to activate) don't work for me. I thought it was because they were captured by the browser or something, but it also does nothing when clicking on them.
And isn't alt+space a global combo in most major OSes? (Window operations in Windows and most Linux distros, and some system dialog in macOS if I'm not mistaken, though that might have been cmd+space.) I use it frequently (mostly to minimize windows but also for other things), and while most people may not do that, I think this extension targets exactly the audience that would. Seems like an odd choice.
I remember using some vim extension but I always found the "hint" being a random character annoying, I briefly used vimperator (iirc) which allowed to fuzzy search elements to focus on which was waaaay better.
Wow, gleeBox looks cool. Never heard of it before.
Does selection act at the structural level of the document, or are they applied to links only? In the video, he seemed only selecting links, and doing actions one by one.
The demo doesn't work very well for me, most of the alt combinations don't seem to do anything (alt+escape to activate works though, luckily). Might need to install the extension to try it out after all.
So far I like the precise scrolling with j/k, going up and down with G/g, jumping to a point of interest (link, image) with f, focusing input boxes with i, and yanking (copying) the focused link (or the page's url if nothing is focused) with y. The parts that work in the live demo, work really nicely.
Personally I have "search when typing" enabled in Firefox which enables navigation like this: https://preview.redd.it/jial7j6lbppz.gif?width=1024&format=m... It isn't as mouse-free as this extension aims to be, but it goes a long way already with no extensions and only a tiny learning curve (to learn some tricks like searching for the text next to a button or field and hitting (shift+)tab). For example, I typically upvote HN comments by typing part of the person's username, shift+tab+tab, enter. Looking for my own post is typically just typing the word "edit".
US, no dead keys. I do have a UK physical layout though, but aside from < and \ everything is in the same place so alt's and escape's keycodes shouldn't have changed.
The symbols as they are printed on my keyboard matches what Wikipedia calls the Linux US layout[1], but I'm pretty sure I bought this in the Netherlands and an ordinary Logitech K200 will not have custom Linux prints on it, so I'm a bit confused. There also exists a Dutch layout with the same physical keys but a different keymap[2], so that's not it.
Trip down memory lane: until Vista, Windows in Dutch shipped with the Dutch and US keyboard layouts both enabled (US was the default) and ctrl+shift as switching hotkey. People would randomly get plusminus symbols when they tried to type a colon because they had accidentally switched to the Dutch layout, which was printed on exactly nobody's keyboard. It happened so often that people would just roll with it, and I think it was generally understood among the heavier computer users that plusminus was supposed to be a colon. Sometimes, someone would reply to such messages: "press ctrl+shift and try the colon again". That person was then thanked profusely. Those were the days.
So I guess that should work then? Most of my keycodes should be the same as anyone from the USA and the demos on the page you linked work perfectly (the WASD game as well as the key combo listener that displays alt+j or whatever just fine).
(Since I can't edit my previous post anymore: ignore the mention of the escape key, alt+esc is actually the only alt combo that works.)
The search bar isn't there unless you start typing, but yes, it's similar to having the cursor in the search bar. And tab works as it usually would, it's not as if you always start tabbing from the search box.
Correction: building the extension requires installing a programming language with sudo bash because the extension needs to communicate with a native app.
For link selection the quickest way could be eye tracking, that is your laptop's camera would track your eye and you could press some key to go to the link which you are looking at.
There's been some activity in the gaming community for DIY solutions to track head movement. Or really any accessible way to get in-game head/camera rotation and/or tilting independent of what the mouse or keyboard is doing.
The simplest one is webcam face feed interpretation. It's also the least liked, because it's CPU/GPU intensive.
The most energy efficient one is based on small devices than measure distance between each other via radio signals or something similar. You put one of them on your head. It has the drawback of having to buy the (cheap) devices.
A middle-ground, which is probably the most popular solution, is a funny looking cardboard cutout with IR reflectors or lights that you put on a hat or headphones. Then you use a webcam feed, but its interpretation is much simpler, because the points to track are easily distinguishable.
All the webcam methods have a significant drawback that they require illumination. You either need lights on your head, or your face has to be brightly illuminated (visible light or IR). A light in my face is the last thing I want personally.
I like to scroll between tabs with J/K, go down the page with d, and the input controls with gi, ge, I also prefer the clicking on links requires less actions, I think krabby could do like a ctrl+f to select with more options and just f to use the default selection. I would also prefer it if it were closer to vim (with H,L, zz, functionality and generally follow the principle of different modes for different functions).
It's strange that you have to press enter too after selecting a link to go there. The most frequent task of browsing is clicking on links, so it should be only f + hint, without any additional keys.
Because The Pokémon Company is unlikely to sue (or even notice) such a marginal and unrelated project, I'd guess. Even if they do notice, a cease and desist letter seems more likely than an actual lawsuit; even in cases of clear substitute goods like AMR2 Nintendo prefers to send cease and desist letters first, I'm sure they don't want the bad press of suing fans. For something like Krabby, this would result in a simple name and logo change. Many people don't have ethical objections to this behavior, so the only thing stopping them would be the potential for actual legal action.
#/media/Bestand:NL_toetsenbord_groot.PNG){kind=link}