it's not just that they are expensive, it's that there is a nondetermistic compute time.Let's say we need to do a comparison. Set`````` a = 34241432415/344425151233 `````` and`````` b = 45034983295/453218433828 `````` Which is greater?Or even more feindish, Set`````` a = 14488683657616/14488641242046 `````` and`````` b = 10733594563328/10733563140768 `````` which is greater?By what algorithm would you do the computation, and could you guarantee me the same compute time as comparing 2/3 and 4/5?

 I’m not sure I follow. Isn’t it just two integer multiplications followed by a comparison.a/b > x/y is the same as ay > xbAssuming you don’t overflow your integer type.
 > Assuming you don’t overflow your integer type.There's your answer :)It's far too easy to overflow your integer type by simply adding a bunch of rationals whose denominators happen to be coprime, or just by multiplying rationals. For this reason, the vast majority of rational implementations use arbitrary precision integers, and of course arithmetic on those isn't constant time.
 One approach would be to hold on to rationals for as long as possible, to eliminate drift, and then dump them out to the nearest floating-point at the very last moment

Search: