Presumably the acting hypotheses is also that a significant number of those incidents caused in  and the general phenomenon of  is exacerbated by mobile phone use.
I read the quote, but as it was on a government web page discussing additional enforcement, I gathered they would have provided the most significant statistic to illustrate the safety criticality of such additional enforcement.
This seemed reasonable given that more than five years ago the NSW Centre for Road Safety was publicly stating mobile phone deaths are one of the "top five" causes of fatalities on NSW roads . As such they have been aware of this factor and collecting significant causality statistics about it for an extended period.
Despite this they do not provide mobile phone death factors at all in their interactive tool  or any public reports that I could locate. The only public NSW mobile phone traffic death statistic that I could find was cited at . If the government had more persuasive statistics than  (which they really should have given over five years of public assertions about the existence of such statistics) then they would have no hesitation publishing them at  or  or elsewhere.
> a significant number of those incidents caused in  and the general phenomenon of  is exacerbated by mobile phone use
Perhaps this is the case, but official NSW data on pedestrian trauma  does not reflect any mobile phone factors. The same document reports hundreds of pedestrian fatalities involving vehicles though.
In conclusion NSW's readily accessible official statistics reflect an annualised 2 mobile phone traffic deaths versus 54 pedestrian deaths over the same period. My comment simply argued focusing on pedestrian deaths would have been a better initial use of automated enforcement (and more importantly the education campaign and road sharing messages around it).