Hmm. C.S. Lewis is perhaps the most influential Christian thinker of the last century. If not, he's second to Francis Schaeffer. You wouldn't think much of a Christian who didn't know who Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris were.
> but anyone advocating for a God or a religion is a person with an agenda
Perhaps so. So is a person advocating for atheism a person with an agenda. So where does that leave you?
As C.S. Lewis said in reply to a different atheist: "That is why the motive game is so uninteresting. I decline the game and continue the conversation."
So: You claim that God - any God - does not exist. What is your basis for claiming this? It sounds like your basis is science. Is that correct?
Hmm. C.S. Lewis is perhaps the most influential Christian thinker of the last century. If not, he's second to Francis Schaeffer. You wouldn't think much of a Christian who didn't know who Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris were.
> but anyone advocating for a God or a religion is a person with an agenda
Perhaps so. So is a person advocating for atheism a person with an agenda. So where does that leave you?
As C.S. Lewis said in reply to a different atheist: "That is why the motive game is so uninteresting. I decline the game and continue the conversation."
So: You claim that God - any God - does not exist. What is your basis for claiming this? It sounds like your basis is science. Is that correct?