Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> It's not "broken"... Python3 is just the evolution of the language.

Python3 broke compatibility for spurious reasons. The language didn't change that much, it could have kept compatibility with minor concessions.

> Java or COBOL maybe have done a better job of not breaking backwards compatibility...

Literally every single other major language has done a better job at it. That's a big part of why they are major languages. Also, most of these are statically typed, so any minor breaking change is far less risky to pull off.

> ...but Python 3 isn't exactly Perl 6 here.

Well, maybe if Perl6 didn't happen Perl wouldn't be irrelevant today.




> Literally every single other major language has done a better job at it.

C++'s upgrade woes make Python 3 look downright trivial in comparison.


What are you talking about? C++ has had very few breaking changes in the language.

If you're talking about ABI breaking, that's a different story. Python breaks the ABI in every major release as well. That generally requires a recompile, not a major code migration.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: