Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's way worse than that.

It's served 25.9MB to me.

They are using ginormous background images, and loading multiples.

8000x4000 jpgs. 32 fuckign megapixels. For a background image.




I had it even worse:

https://imgur.com/XctFp8c.png

32.6 MB

And I have to agree with the OP, simple things like this instantly drive away my trust that they know what they're doing.


>>> simple things like this instantly drive away my trust that they know what they're doing

It inspires me with confidence that they are focused only on things that get them launched.


That works great until it doesn’t?

What else have they ignored that is going to bite them in the ass?


Yeah okay, forget first impressions. It's such a basic thing, who knows what else they've screwed up.


Bounce rates and load times are important if you want people to try the product.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: