Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> That it currently do not work economically is the issue that the article showcase.

It's more than that. We simply don't live in a world where physics is in favor for doing this.

Many people have done more than back of the envelope calculations to show this simply was a non starter.

Those (people who took money to build ) push this idea are either ignorant at best and dishonest at worst.




I do wonder if the concept could work on a sidewalk, given that they aren't being perpetually driven over by 3,000+ pound vehicles.


Water drainage is still going to be a big problem, as is damage/scratching caused by shoes, bicycle kickstands, trolleys, anything else with wheels that is pushed/pulled, you name it. Plus the simple fact that most sidewalks (at least here in the city) are often in the shadows of buildings.

It only makes sense to start thinking about sidewalks once you've covered all the roofs, which are way better in every sense.


There's a solar bike path in Holland which did pretty well. Exceeded expected yield the first two years but then dropped back to slightly under.

https://en.solaroad.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/prf1-ENG-S...


It didn't do well, they just marketed the failure as a success, and they were at scamming a different municipality for a follow up 'experiment'.

Why can't they just work on something that makes sense?


The ground pressure from a truck is around 150 PSI. A woman wearing high heels can match, and even exceed that.

So the sidewalk would need to be just as strong as the road.


It's not that simple. Looking at the damaged roadway, I see lots of punctate damage. That puzzled me until I read your comment. I'm pretty sure that it's gravel under truck tires. So the same force-concentration dynamic as high heels.


Not only that, a common problem round here (UK) is that trucks park partially on the pavement. They routinely crack two-inch/50mm thick concrete paving slabs. I'd like to see a solar panel that can withstand that.


Surprised this is getting down voted, this is a common example in physics 101 describing the concept of point pressure. Architects have to consider the point pressure of heels when designing certain walkways.


Common physics example, but it disregards how women actually walk and stand in heels. They walk on their forefoot, rather than balancing their weight on the heel.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-higher-the-heel-th...

Shows less than 30 N/cm^2 (40 PSI) for women in heels - and higher heels result in lower heel pressure. Forefoot pressure is higher, despite the larger surface area.


Yeah, and a heel surface area of 32.3 +/- 4.4 cm^2. There are shoes with heel surface area of sub 1cm^2.

I don't think the study invalidates parents claim, if anything it more it less supports it.


Even so. It would be a flaw to not consider that at some point in time a women may put full force on the heel. Thus the example is valid.

Also I have seen high hees being abused by walking mostly on the heel.


The woman in heels doesn’t ever slam on her brakes and skid.


That applies sheer stress to the road, but it doesn't really impact the compressive force or pressure applied, right?


Sidewalks are still flat on the ground, which is not great in much of the world (like Normandy) where sunlight comes in at an angle. You would still get some generation, but would it be worth it compared to cells mounted elsewhere at a better angle, with less need for hardening, and less accumulation of dirt? Doing this on the sidewalks would add a lot of costs and complications.


Better to build it above the sidewalk where it can be angled more efficiently and provide people with some sun/rain shelter.


Maybe a motorway hard shoulder would be preferable to a live lane.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: