Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

An unauthenticated protocol that allows unsigned routes to be blindly accepted is not a good protocol, that's why Cloudflare has been pushing RPKI for a while https://blog.cloudflare.com/rpki/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/rpki-details/



It has authentication and requires explicit configuration to form a neighbor relationship.

BGP was designed for operators to implement a routing policy. In most implementations it allows everything by default with no modifications to route metadata, so if you do not set up your policy correctly you'll have issues like this.


It has authentication for only one hop, if routes propagated all the way up the chain with signatures, it would be much easier to block/limit bad AS behavior.


Your peering relationship is only for one hop. What it lacks is prefix/path validation, not authentication.


But authentication of every advertised range all the way up the chain would allow upstream providers to easily differentiate valid large prefix announcements that were done intentionally (e.g. big ISP announcing some routes) from crazy nonsense done by an unknown party that isn't a big ISP. We definitely need prefix filtering, but there needs to be some easily verifiable source of identity tied to each announcement to be able to automate the process of accepting and rejecting large prefix announcements.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: