I don't see the point of this article, in it, she admits to being a pro-antifa person. Says positive things about antifa work that is done and lists a few instances in which she wrote about activist causes aligned with antifa. Putting her on a 'Antifa Journalists' list seems more than fair regardless of whether she literally masks up and goes marching. Whether people harass her because of being on the list is a different story, there is nothing intrinsically harassing about being on a list that identifies you as something you openly are.
Note: Antifa activists themselves create lists like this of right-wing individuals and their personal information all the time, as a keystone of antifa organizing activities. Why wouldn't they expect and understand that their enemies might attempt the same?
A list of people that is specifically maintained for and publicised to an audience that hates those people is dangerous and immoral. It seems like you're contending against that, but your reasoning is unclear. It also seems like you're presenting the fact that the same behavior can be found in a politically opposite context as some kind of justification, but that doesn't make any sense to me.
Interesting. Maybe the best way to not be doxxed and put on a list like this is to not associate with people who are involved with doxxing. Antifa does the same shit.
> He baldly opined that several journalists are mere “cogs in an activist enterprise that churns out both pro-Antifa propaganda and doxing information about real or imagined ideological enemies”—which is a rather rude way to refer to people who are doing their literal jobs by exposing neo-Nazis.
Politics aside, how are the subject of this article actions any different from the author's?
