Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is weird because "making it easier" seems a bit like screwing over people who want more control and specifics. MS is relatively new at packaging open source and doesn't seem to have much experience in the phenomenon of official packages being not what you want.



I think this is wonderful for people who are interested in learning programming. Right now one of the biggest hurdles to learning programming is just getting the damn environment set up. Why does it have to be so hard? How many people never learn to program because they can't get "hello world" to print out?

This could make it extremely easy. "What programming language should I use?" "Learn Python." "How do I install it?" "Through the Windows installer." Boom, done. They're off to the races.

People who want control and specifics are advanced enough to figure out how to get that themselves.


I very much agree and love how the programming language AutoIt does it. When I was starting out, both C and Java took several frustrating hours to set up (don't get me started on requiring environment variables to be manually changed). However, after a basic installation, AutoIt gives its au3 files a right-click context menu option to compile to an exe. It also gives you a shortcut to a help file that contains basic examples, a complete list of language concepts, and a complete list of all first party functions and a page on every single one complete with an example of how to use it.


>This is weird because "making it easier" seems a bit like screwing over people who want more control and specifics.

In what way does it screw over people who want more control? You don't have to get the python distribution from the Windows store.

It does help students/beginners/'people that want to hassle free install' get going with python.


I'm not sure. It's not really all that different from any Linux distro (or macOS) having a specific version of the python binaries in their own repositories. Basically, this is for those that either need the hand held manner of doing it, respect Microsoft's vetting, or any other reasons.

For those that want to install the most recently released or a specific version number of the python installer, there's still the obvious channels and those people that would seek it out will know how to find it the normal way already. It's fine.


If you want more control and specifics then presumably you are capable of downloading Python from elsewhere and installing it however you want?


I don't see how it screws over experts. I can still install a different version if I want to in exactly the same number of steps as before, right?


I could very easily see a scenario in which your own version has a conflict with the official one. For example maybe you need to get really careful about where the install stub is on PATH.

The possibility of a built-in one not being what you want adds a whole category of issues that wouldn't surface before. Maybe also those alternative ways of packaging die out due to lack of interest.


If someone is an expert, and can't re-order path variables, then someone isn't an expert.


Use your imagination. Sometimes the machines are not set up and maintained by you. Sometimes you write scripts and run them far away. Sometimes someone else's script mucks with PATH. Now there is an ambiguity about which python runs.

Ask folks who ran into this with an old release installed by default, as in a Mac. Some of them appear to be on the thread.


Those people are free to install it as they so choose.




Registration is open for Startup School 2019. Classes start July 22nd.

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: