On: DailyMail: fifty percent drop in traffic after Google update

[daleharvey]

You think it should be googles duty to promote bad publications by means of the algorithm it generated?

[creaghpatr → daleharvey]

It should be their duty to be transparent about the matter.

[spookthesunset → creaghpatr]

And how to you propose this be done?

Google has to order its results somehow. How do you propose they order them?

[tomohawk → daleharvey]

That is not the issue. There is a claim that Google manually intervened to DEmote the "bad publication".

Should that be Google's duty? If so, what is Google's responsibility with regard to transparency and accountability?

[sam0x17 → tomohawk]

Much more likely that they made some global changes, and dailymail happened to be one of the hardest-hit high profile sites, because the amount of click-baity untrue stuff they publish.