Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You mean like this standard library code?

https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draf...

> I sense some frustration about the language... what happened to make you so anti-Go?

Go is C with GC and bounds checking, aka Limbo reborn with some Oberon-2 influence.

Already much better for our IT safety than sticking with C, still I kind of expected Google capable of producing Swift, Rust or TypeScript level of language design, given their pile of PhDs.




that's not standard library code? that's a link to one of the few thousand proposals for changing Go error handling... I'm not sure what you're trying to say here...

I think keeping Go this simple was an extremely hard thing to do for the designers. I don't know what the intentions were for Swift or Rust, but the Go team were always pretty straightforward that what they wanted was a safer C to write servers in. I think we all agree that they achieved that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: