Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Alacritty Terminal Version 0.3.0 Release
21 points by undeadleech 17 days ago | hide | past | web | favorite | 10 comments



I'm one of the Alacritty maintainers and Version 0.3.0 has just been released, since this is a slightly bigger release I've decided to write up what has changed for people who haven't been following the project.

If you have any questions, please let me know. I'm happy to answer all of them.

The source of the project can be found here: https://github.com/jwilm/alacritty


I've used Alacritty quite often, and I particularly like font and color rendering. It does respect my Xdefaults, whereas XTerm or URxvt don't. It simply looks much better.

Now, playing a bit of devils advocate, why shall I abandon either of those in favour of Alacritty? XTerm, in particular, has much lower memory usage and significantly lower latency.


If you want the lowest possible memory usage, Alacritty will likely never be for you. Initializing the OpenGL drivers alone ramps up the memory usage to more than what some other terminal emulators operate at, making it impossible for Alacritty to match that.

However, there are other advantages that I personally am really fond of (after all I myself joined the project long after it was started).

For many the incredible throughput is probably a big plus. And I have to admit it's just fun to play around with. Using ascii to play videos at almost HD quality.

But the reason why I use it myself is much more subtle, it's mainly about the little things. So it's hard to put a finger on 'the one thing' why I enjoy it.

It has sane defaults and is much simpler to configure than something like URxvt. It is lighter than VTE and doesn't pull in as many dependencies. It has all the right features that I value which is often much more a preference than something easily objectifyable. It's also easy for me to hack on because even before I joined upstream was very cooperative.

In general I think it really depends on what you value so my personal opinion might be of little value to you or anyone else. So really the only way I see to tell if you are a fan of it or not is to just give it a shot.


Thanks for the detailed writeup! You are certainly right with regards to memory usage and ease of configuration. Keep up the good work.


Alacritty is a live saver on macOS. Nothing else seems to come close in terms of latency.


It seems Terminal.app is measurably faster...

https://danluu.com/term-latency/


I really do love what Alacritty is doing. I've been using it as my principal TTY for a few weeks now, and it has been a joy to use.

Thank you for all the hard work. It might go unsaid sometimes, but it is not unnoticed!


> Thank you for all the hard work. It might go unsaid sometimes, but it is not unnoticed!

Thanks for going out of your way to say that! It's incredibly encouraging to see people enjoy Alacritty and hopefully that will drive many others to join and make it even better than it is now!


I've been keeping an eye on alacritty and sort of expect to switch at some point, especially if I begin using Wayland. I've got urxvt configured the way I like it but it can be annoying that default packaged builds are often configured for 88 rather than 256 colours. At the moment, I'd miss the search plugin for searching the scrollback buffer (though I'd prefer if it'd just let me use less) and the single process daemon mode of urxvt.


A search feature is definitely planned and I feel like that would be a great addition to Alacritty.

Daemon mode has also been proposed, however there's only limited advantages Alacritty would gain from that. However it does seem like it's necessary to get proper support for macOS for example, so it will likely come too.




Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: