Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yes, if said work was for hire, it counts as 70 years from creation and not 70 years from dissolution of organisation requesting the work.



When was creation? If they change out the light pattern for a new one, or add blink tags to it or have it light up in a playful show involving multi-colours and timed to some inspiring music is that a new creation?

I'd guess that these aren't large enough differences to afford a new date but I almost feel resigned to the idea that this is exactly what will happen.


> If they change out the light pattern for a new one, or add blink tags to it or have it light up in a playful show involving multi-colours and timed to some inspiring music is that a new creation?

It would depend on how substantive the changes were. But most of your proposals are probably sufficient, yes.


That's not necessarily the case for compound works in Europe.

For instance, in the UK the copyright in a film only expires as you say in the event that the film does not have a director, screenplay, authored dialogue or composed music. If it has any of them them the countdown begins at the end of the year in which the last of them dies (which is fifty years in this instance). Also worth noting that even though the film may go out of copyright in this scenario, the script/dialogue does not until seventy years after the death of the writer. Work for hire is irrelevant to that consideration.


Film and architectural works are special cases, not the general rule. Not all compound works enjoy individual copyright term extension.




Applications are open for YC Winter 2020

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: