> Then there is the sound profile, which includes background noise, quality of microphone, speakers distance to device, etc. For recorded audio books, the speaker is often using a somewhat sophisticated setup to make the audio quality as clean as possible. This type of setup is obviously unusual when people want to speak to their devices.
It shouldn't be that hard to degrade the quality synthetically? And with a clean source you can synthesize different types of noise/distortions.
I can't speak for voice data, as I've not worked with voice, but I did my MSc on various approaches for reducing error rates for OCR. I used a mix of synthetically degraded data ranging from applying different kinds of noise to physically degrading printed pages (crumpling, rubbing sand on them, water damage), and while it gave interesting comparative results between OCR engines, the types of errors I got never closely matched the types of errors I got from finding genuine degraded old books. I've seen that in other areas too.
My takeaway from that was that while synthetic degradation of inputs can be useful, and while it is "easy", the hard part is making it match real degradation closely enough to be representative. It's often really hard to replicate natural noise closely enough for it be sufficient to use those kind of methods.
Doesn't mean it's not worth trying, but I'd say that unless voice is very different it's the type of thing that's mostly worth doing if you can't get your hands on anything better.
You might say, if you can identify and simulate all cases of real life degradation, your problem is basically solved, just reverse the simulation on your inputs.
I’m not saying ocr isn’t hard. I’m saying normalizing all those characters basically is the problem.
> And with a clean source you can synthesize different types of noise/distortions.
You'd have to know what the most common types of noise are, how they interact with the signal, etc. This method of collecting data can provide useful info on what that noise actually is.
It shouldn't be that hard to degrade the quality synthetically? And with a clean source you can synthesize different types of noise/distortions.