The language from Yelp pretty much spells out their case:
> "Yelp respects religious and personal responsibilities and makes reasonable accommodations when requested" (emphasis added)
I haven't read any court papers. My guess is their defense will hinge on them trying to prove the plaintiff didn't adequate accommodations.
Doesn't pass the smell test if you ask me. If it's important enough to fire somebody over, it's important enough to have a clear escalation strategy in case one person isn't available.
> "Yelp respects religious and personal responsibilities and makes reasonable accommodations when requested" (emphasis added)
I haven't read any court papers. My guess is their defense will hinge on them trying to prove the plaintiff didn't adequate accommodations.
Doesn't pass the smell test if you ask me. If it's important enough to fire somebody over, it's important enough to have a clear escalation strategy in case one person isn't available.