Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Retaliatory unprovoked attacks are not acceptable either.



>unprovoked

I think you could argue the existence of a platform for managing women as chattel is provocation enough.


I'm pretty sure you can find a group seeing the existence of a platform for managing X (replace with something you disagree with) the same provocation. Does that give them an licence to retaliate ?

How far do you go through the rabbit-hole of so called "provocation" before it's deemed "too much" ?


> Retaliatory unprovoked

Contradiction in terms.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: