Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Host agrees to DMCA takedown of GPL'd work after Author rescinds license (gitlab.com/mikeeusa)
7 points by gitnews on Feb 1, 2019 | hide | past | favorite | 6 comments



I get the feeling the FSF may have a thing or two to say about this. If it was possible to simply rescind the license from GPL code, there would have been several court cases that would have been muuuuuch shorter.

Simply put, once the GPL license is applied, authors can only relicense future versions. Anyone can fork old versions and start their own development branch under a different name. The GPL also does not provide restrictions allowing authors to terminate the license for individuals while still maintaining the code as available as GPL.


That name is familiar... google finds this old HN threadlet: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3163841


emphasize the public's interest in the GPL license? emphasize the interest of all contributors that spend time on modifications?


This is why we can't have good things.


https://gitlab.com/MikeeUSA/GPC-Slots-2/blob/master/DMCA%20T...

https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/1/843

Host agrees to DMCA takedown of GPL'd work after Author rescinds license from "John Doe". Yes you CAN rescind the GPL.

https://gitlab.com/MikeeUSA/GPC-Slots-2/blob/master/DMCA%20T...

In the USA, a license is revocable (absent an attached interest.) (An attached interest generally arises when a licensee paid for a copyright license contract. Thus they "buy" the "terms" and the courts will hold the grantor to the contract. Where there is not an interest, the license is revocable)

To put it simply: you pay nothing, you get nothing. Only the continued magnanimity of the copyright owner allows you to continue to use, modify, redistribute the copyright owner's work. If you anger him he may decide to revoke your bare gratuitous license.

The linux kernel contributors who own the Copyright to their code can do the same, should they dislike the "CoC" and having their speech controlled by do-nothings for the sake of women's empowerment over the men who actually built the whole thing (for free!).

http://8ch.net/tech/res/1018729.html#q1025891

-----

Anonymous 02/01/19 (Fri) 10:32:53 No.1025891>>1025897 >>1025945

Oh fuggggg. Mikee wasn't memeing.

---- Hi,

We have received a DMCA complaint regarding content that is under your control. We\u2019ve included the entire DMCA request below: [\u2026] If you believe you are not infringing you have the ability to file a counter-notice as per DMCA. A counter complaint requires:

Your name Your address Your email address A digital signature

And statement under penalty of perjury that you have "a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled."

If we do not receive a counter-notice within 48 hours, your account will be disabled and the content in question removed.

Regards, Cynthia Ng Support Agent, GitLab Inc. ---- ----


If I spend 8h looking into some software, basically paying 1000 USD consulting fees, does this create an attached interest?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: